Koolhaas Jaap M, de Boer Sietse F, Buwalda Bauke, van Reenen Kees
Department of Behavioral Physiology, University Groningen, Haren, The Netherlands.
Brain Behav Evol. 2007;70(4):218-26. doi: 10.1159/000105485. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
Ecological studies on feral populations of mice, fish and birds elucidate the functional significance of phenotypes that differ individually in their behavioral and neuroendocrine response to environmental challenge. Within a species, the capacity to cope with environmental challenges largely determines individual survival in the natural habitat. Recent studies indicate that individual variation within a species may buffer the species for strong fluctuations in the natural habitat. A conceptual framework will be presented that is based on the view that individual variation in aggressive behavior can be considered more generally as a variation in actively coping with environmental challenges. Highly aggressive individuals adopt a proactive coping style whereas low levels of aggression indicate a more passive or reactive style of coping. Coping styles have now been identified in a range of species and can be considered as trait characteristics that are stable over time and across situations. The dimension of coping style seems to be independent of an emotionality dimension. Hence, in the analysis of the proximate mechanisms of stress and adaptation, one has to consider the possibility that the mechanisms which determine the type of stress response might be independent from those underlying the magnitude of the response. The two coping styles differ in a number of important neurobiological and neuroendocrine systems. For example, proactive males differ significantly from reactive males in the homeostatic control of serotonergic activity resulting in completely opposite dose response relationships of various serotonergic drugs. The results so far show that proactive coping is characterized by a strong inhibitory control of the 5-HT neuron via its somatodendritic 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor. It is hypothesized that the regulation of serotonin release is causally related to coping style rather than emotionality. Understanding the functional individual variation as it occurs in nature and the underlying neurobiology and neuroendocrinology is fundamental in understanding individual vulnerability to stress related disease.
对野生小鼠、鱼类和鸟类种群的生态学研究阐明了不同表型在行为和神经内分泌对环境挑战的反应方面的功能意义。在一个物种内,应对环境挑战的能力在很大程度上决定了其在自然栖息地中的个体生存。最近的研究表明,物种内的个体差异可能会缓冲该物种在自然栖息地中的剧烈波动。将提出一个概念框架,其基于这样一种观点,即攻击行为的个体差异可以更普遍地被视为在积极应对环境挑战方面的差异。高攻击性个体采用主动应对方式,而低攻击性水平则表明更被动或反应性的应对方式。现在已经在一系列物种中确定了应对方式,并且可以将其视为随时间和跨情境稳定的特质特征。应对方式的维度似乎独立于情绪维度。因此,在分析应激和适应的近端机制时,必须考虑这样一种可能性,即决定应激反应类型的机制可能独立于反应强度所依据的机制。这两种应对方式在许多重要的神经生物学和神经内分泌系统方面存在差异。例如,主动型雄性在血清素能活动的稳态控制方面与反应型雄性有显著差异,导致各种血清素能药物的剂量反应关系完全相反。迄今为止的结果表明,主动应对的特征是通过其树突体5-HT(1A)自身受体对5-HT神经元进行强烈的抑制控制。据推测,血清素释放的调节与应对方式而非情绪有因果关系。理解自然发生的功能性个体差异以及潜在的神经生物学和神经内分泌学对于理解个体对应激相关疾病的易感性至关重要。