Standard surgical versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in intensive care patients.

OBJECTIVE

The present prospective randomized trial compared surgical tracheostomy (ST) and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in terms of outcomes and complications.

METHODS

Between January 2003 and December 2005 tracheostomies were performed on critically ill ICU patients in Medical Faculty Hospital in Prague, with a random allocation of 105 patients for ST and 100 for PDT.

RESULTS

The 2 groups did not differ significantly in terms of basic demographic characteristics or length of endotracheal intubation prior to the procedure. Following the procedures, the 2 groups did not differ significantly in terms of the time required for decannulation, decannulated patients or mortalities. Post-mortem examination showed that both groups were similar in terms of placement of the tracheostomy tube. Surgical tracheostomy was found to take longer time to perform than PDT (p<0.001). In terms of early postoperative complications, PDT was associated with a higher rate of postoperative bleeding compared to ST (p=0.0302).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is a simpler and faster technique to perform, but is associated with a higher occurrence of early complications, particularly postoperative bleeding.