Suppr超能文献

家庭医疗中抑郁症评估干预的随机试验。

A randomized trial of depression assessment intervention in home health care.

作者信息

Bruce Martha L, Brown Ellen L, Raue Patrick J, Mlodzianowski Amy E, Meyers Barnett S, Leon Andrew C, Heo Moonseong, Byers Amy L, Greenberg Rebecca L, Rinder Susan, Katt Wendy, Nassisi Pamela

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, White Plains, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Nov;55(11):1793-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01419.x. Epub 2007 Oct 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether an educational intervention would improve depression assessment and appropriate referral. Secondary analyses tested whether referral led to depression improvement.

DESIGN

Training in the Assessment of Depression (TRIAD) was a three-group, nurse-randomized trial. Researchers interviewed randomly selected patients at baseline and 8 weeks.

SETTING

Three certified home healthcare agencies in Westchester County, New York.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-three medical/surgical nurses were randomized within agency to three intervention groups: full, minimal, or control. Research contact with nurses' patients (aged >65; N=477) yielded 256 (53.7%) enrolled subjects, 84 (17.6%) ineligibles, and 120 (25.2%) refusals; 233 of the 256 (87.1%) enrolled patients completed follow-up interviews.

INTERVENTION

Nurse training in clinically meaningful use of depression sections of Medicare's mandatory Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS).

MEASUREMENTS

Nurse-assessed mood or anhedonia (OASIS) versus research assessments using the Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition Disorders (SCID); referrals for mental health evaluation (agency records), and depression severity (24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; HDRS).

RESULTS

Referral rates for patients with (SCID) depressed mood or anhedonia (n=75) varied according to nurse group: 50.0% full intervention, 18.5% minimal, 21.4% control (P=.047). Rates for nondepressed patients (n=180) did not differ (4.9%, 2.0%, 5.8%, respectively; P=.60). In patients with major or minor depression (n=37), referral was associated with symptom improvement. Change in HDRS was 5 points greater in referred patients than others (P=.04). Concordance between OASIS and SCID did not differ between intervention groups.

CONCLUSION

TRIAD showed that training nurses to assess for depression using an approach developed in partnership with home healthcare agencies led to appropriate referral and care for depressed patients.

摘要

目的

确定一项教育干预措施是否会改善抑郁症评估及恰当转诊。二级分析检验了转诊是否能改善抑郁症状况。

设计

抑郁症评估培训(TRIAD)是一项三组护士随机试验。研究人员在基线期和8周时对随机选取的患者进行访谈。

地点

纽约州韦斯特切斯特县的三家经认证的家庭医疗保健机构。

参与者

53名内科/外科护士在机构内被随机分为三个干预组:全面干预组、最低限度干预组或对照组。与护士的患者(年龄>65岁;N = 477)进行研究接触后,有256名(53.7%)受试者登记入组,84名(17.6%)不符合条件,120名(25.2%)拒绝参与;256名登记患者中有233名(87.1%)完成了随访访谈。

干预措施

对护士进行关于医疗保险强制性结果与评估信息集(OASIS)中抑郁症部分的临床意义性使用的培训。

测量指标

护士评估的情绪或快感缺失(OASIS)与使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版轴I障碍的结构化临床访谈(SCID)进行的研究评估;心理健康评估的转诊情况(机构记录)以及抑郁严重程度(24项汉密尔顿抑郁量表;HDRS)。

结果

有抑郁情绪或快感缺失(SCID)的患者(n = 75)的转诊率因护士组而异:全面干预组为50.0%,最低限度干预组为18.5%,对照组为21.4%(P = 0.047)。无抑郁患者(n = 180)的转诊率无差异(分别为4.9%、2.0%、5.8%;P = 0.60)。在患有重度或轻度抑郁症的患者(n = 37)中,转诊与症状改善相关。转诊患者的HDRS变化比其他患者大5分(P = 0.04)。干预组之间OASIS与SCID的一致性无差异。

结论

TRIAD研究表明,培训护士使用与家庭医疗保健机构合作开发的方法评估抑郁症,可实现对抑郁症患者的恰当转诊和护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验