Fazio Vanessa C, Lovell Mark R, Pardini Jamie E, Collins Michael W
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(3):207-16.
The objective of this study was to examine differences in neurocognitive performance between symptomatic concussed athletes, a group of concussed athletes with no subjective symptoms, and a non-concussed control group of athletes. All concussed athletes were evaluated within one week of injury using the ImPACT computerized test battery. Results indicate that concussed athletes who denied subjective symptoms demonstrated poorer performance than control subjects on all four composite scores of the ImPACT test batters (Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Reaction Time and Processing Speed However, the concussed but asymptomatic group demonstrated significantly better performance than did the concussed and symptomatic group. Thus, concussed athletes who did not report subjective symptoms were not fully recovered based on neurocognitive testing. This study underscores the importance of neurocognitive testing in the assessment of concussion sequelae and recovery.
本研究的目的是检验有症状的脑震荡运动员、一组无主观症状的脑震荡运动员以及非脑震荡运动员对照组之间神经认知表现的差异。所有脑震荡运动员在受伤后一周内使用ImPACT计算机化测试组合进行评估。结果表明,否认有主观症状的脑震荡运动员在ImPACT测试组合的所有四项综合得分(言语记忆、视觉记忆、反应时间和处理速度)上的表现均不如对照组。然而,脑震荡但无症状的组表现明显优于有症状的脑震荡组。因此,根据神经认知测试,未报告主观症状的脑震荡运动员并未完全康复。这项研究强调了神经认知测试在评估脑震荡后遗症和恢复情况中的重要性。