Suppr超能文献

物种丰富的澳大利亚灌木丛中土壤与冠层种子储存及植物物种共存情况

Soil vs. canopy seed storage and plant species coexistence in species-rich Australian shrublands.

作者信息

Enright N J, Mosner E, Miller B P, Johnson N, Lamont Byron B

机构信息

Geography Program, School of Social and Environmental Enquiry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.

出版信息

Ecology. 2007 Sep;88(9):2292-304. doi: 10.1890/06-1343.1.

Abstract

The fire-prone shrublands of southwestern Australia are renowned for their high plant species diversity and prominence of canopy seed storage (serotiny). We compared species richness, abundance, and life history attributes for soil and canopy seed banks in relation to extant vegetation among four sites with different substrate conditions and high species turnover (50-80%) to identify whether this unusual community-level organization of seed storage might contribute to maintenance of high species richness. Soil seed bank (SSB) densities were low to moderate (233-1435 seeds/m2) compared with densities for other Mediterranean-type vegetation and were lowest for sites with highest canopy seed bank (CSB) species richness and lowest nutrient availability, but not richness or abundance of resprouters. Annuals were infrequent in the lowest nutrient sites, but there was no evidence that small SSB size was due to low seed inputs or a trade-off between seed production/storage and seed size in response to low nutrient availability. Sorensen's similarity between SSB and extant vegetation was 26-43% but increased to 54-57% when the CSB was included, representing levels higher than reported for most other ecosystems. Resprouting species were well represented in both the SSB and CSB, and there was no evidence for lower seed production in resprouters than in non-sprouters overall. The SSB and CSB held no species in common and were characterized by markedly different seed dispersal attributes, with winged or small seeds in the CSB and seeds dispersed by ants, birds, and wind (though none with wings) in the SSB. There was no evidence of spatial differentiation in the distribution of seeds of SSB species between vegetated and open microsites that might facilitate species coexistence, but most woody non-sprouters showed aggregation at scales of 1-2 m, implying limited seed dispersal. High similarity between overall seed bank (SSB + CSB) and extant species composition, high number of resprouting species, and seed dispersal processes before (SSB) and after fire (CSB) leading to differential spatial aggregation of post-fire recruits from the two seed bank types may buffer species composition against rapid change and provide a mechanism for maintaining species coexistence at the local scale.

摘要

澳大利亚西南部易发生火灾的灌木丛以其丰富的植物物种多样性和显著的冠层种子储存(胎萌现象)而闻名。我们比较了四个具有不同基质条件和高物种周转率(50 - 80%)的地点土壤种子库和冠层种子库的物种丰富度、丰度以及生活史特征与现存植被的关系,以确定这种不同寻常的种子储存群落水平组织是否有助于维持高物种丰富度。与其他地中海型植被的密度相比,土壤种子库(SSB)密度较低至中等(233 - 1435粒种子/平方米),在冠层种子库(CSB)物种丰富度最高且养分有效性最低的地点密度最低,但不是萌生植物的丰富度或丰度最低。在养分最低的地点一年生植物很少见,但没有证据表明土壤种子库规模小是由于种子输入低或因养分有效性低而在种子生产/储存与种子大小之间进行权衡的结果。土壤种子库与现存植被之间的索伦森相似度为26 - 43%,但当包括冠层种子库时增加到54 - 57%,代表的水平高于大多数其他生态系统的报道。萌生植物在土壤种子库和冠层种子库中都有很好的代表性,总体上没有证据表明萌生植物的种子产量低于非萌生植物。土壤种子库和冠层种子库没有共同的物种,并且具有明显不同的种子传播属性,冠层种子库中有带翅或小的种子,而土壤种子库中的种子由蚂蚁、鸟类和风传播(尽管没有带翅的)。没有证据表明土壤种子库物种的种子在植被覆盖和开阔微生境之间的分布存在空间差异,这可能促进物种共存,但大多数木本非萌生植物在1 - 2米的尺度上表现出聚集,这意味着种子传播有限。总体种子库(土壤种子库 + 冠层种子库)与现存物种组成之间的高度相似性、大量的萌生植物物种以及火灾前(土壤种子库)和火灾后(冠层种子库)的种子传播过程导致两种种子库类型的火灾后新植株出现不同的空间聚集,这可能缓冲物种组成免受快速变化的影响,并提供一种在局部尺度上维持物种共存的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验