Bakker Jonathan D, Moore Margaret M
Ecological Restoration Institute, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 15017, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011-5017, USA.
Ecology. 2007 Sep;88(9):2305-19. doi: 10.1890/06-1775.1.
Long-term studies can broaden our ecological understanding and are particularly important when examining contingent effects that involve changes to dominance by long-lived species. Such a change occurred during the last century in Southwestern (USA) ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests. We used five livestock grazing exclosures established in 1912 to quantify vegetation structure in 1941 and 2004. Our objectives were to (1) assess the effects of historical livestock grazing on overstory structure and age distribution, (2) assess the effects of recent livestock grazing and overstory on understory vegetation, and (3) quantify and explain changes in understory vegetation between 1941 and 2004. In 1941, canopy cover of tree regeneration was significantly higher inside exclosures. In 2004, total tree canopy cover was twice as high, density was three times higher, trees were smaller, and total basal area was 40% higher inside exclosures. Understory species density, herbaceous plant density, and herbaceous cover were negatively correlated with overstory vegetation in both years. Most understory variables did not differ between grazing treatments in 1941 but were lower inside exclosures in 2004. Differences between grazing treatments disappeared once overstory effects were accounted for, indicating that they were due to the differential overstory response to historical livestock grazing practices. Between 1941 and 2004, species density declined by 34%, herbaceous plant density by 37%, shrub cover by 69%, total herbaceous cover by 59%, graminoid cover by 39%, and forb cover by 82%. However, these variables did not differ between grazing treatments or years once overstory effects were accounted for, indicating that the declines were driven by the increased dominance of the overstory during this period. Our results demonstrate that historical livestock grazing practices are an aspect of land-use history that can affect ecosystem development. Grazing history must be considered when extrapolating results from one site to another. In addition, the understory vegetation was more strongly controlled by the ponderosa pine overstory than by recent livestock grazing or by temporal dynamics, indicating that overstory effects must be accounted for when examining understory responses in this ecosystem.
长期研究能够拓宽我们对生态的理解,在研究涉及长寿物种优势度变化的偶然效应时尤为重要。这种变化曾于上世纪在美国西南部的黄松(Pinus ponderosa)森林中发生。我们利用1912年设立的五个牲畜禁牧区来量化1941年和2004年的植被结构。我们的目标是:(1)评估历史上牲畜放牧对上层林冠结构和年龄分布的影响;(2)评估近期牲畜放牧和上层林冠对下层植被的影响;(3)量化并解释1941年至2004年间下层植被的变化。1941年,禁牧区树木更新的树冠覆盖率显著更高。2004年,禁牧区的总树冠覆盖率高出两倍,密度高出三倍,树木更小,总断面积高出40%。这两年中,下层物种密度、草本植物密度和草本覆盖度均与上层植被呈负相关。1941年,大多数下层变量在放牧处理间并无差异,但在2004年,禁牧区的这些变量更低。一旦考虑了上层林冠的影响,放牧处理间的差异就消失了,这表明差异是由于上层林冠对历史上牲畜放牧方式的不同反应所致。1941年至2004年间,物种密度下降了34%,草本植物密度下降了37%,灌木覆盖度下降了69%,总草本覆盖度下降了59%,禾本科植物覆盖度下降了39%,杂类草覆盖度下降了82%。然而,一旦考虑了上层林冠的影响,这些变量在放牧处理或年份间并无差异,这表明下降是由这一时期上层林冠优势度增加所致。我们的结果表明,历史上的牲畜放牧方式是土地利用历史的一个方面,会影响生态系统的发展。在将一个地点的结果外推到另一个地点时,必须考虑放牧历史。此外,下层植被受黄松上层林冠的控制比受近期牲畜放牧或时间动态的控制更强,这表明在研究该生态系统的下层反应时,必须考虑上层林冠的影响。