Ismail F, Demling A, Hessling K, Fink M, Stiesch-Scholz M
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Nov;34(11):807-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01748.x.
A prospective randomized study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of physical therapy in addition to splint therapy on treatment outcome in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) with respect to objective and subjective parameters. Twenty-six patients suffering from an arthrogenic TMD and exhibiting a painfully restricted jaw opening were randomized in two groups. Thirteen patients were treated solely with Michigan splint (group I), 13 patients received supplementary physical therapy (group II). Before treatment a clinical examination and electronic recording of jaw movements were performed and subjective pain level was evaluated by visual analogue scales. After 3 months of therapy maintenance of improvement was evaluated. Within treatment groups comparison of data before and after treatment was analysed using Wilcoxon test. Groups were compared by Mann-Withney-U test. A P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Compared with the baseline, in both groups mandibular movement capacity increased significantly after treatment, whereas subjective pain decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Active jaw opening increased from 28.6 +/- 5.8 to 35.9 +/- 4.8 mm in group I and from 30.1 +/- 5.4 to 40.8 +/- 4.1 mm in group II. After therapy the difference of active jaw opening between groups was significant (P < 0.05). Physical therapy also gave a supplementary improvement of protrusive mandibular movement capacity during electronic registration and subjective pain level. For none of these parameters this difference between groups was significant. Physical therapy seems to have a positive effect on treatment outcome of patients with TMD.
开展了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估在夹板治疗基础上进行物理治疗对颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)患者治疗效果的客观和主观参数的影响。26例患有关节源性TMD且存在疼痛性张口受限的患者被随机分为两组。13例患者仅接受密歇根夹板治疗(I组),13例患者接受辅助物理治疗(II组)。治疗前进行临床检查和下颌运动的电子记录,并通过视觉模拟量表评估主观疼痛程度。治疗3个月后评估改善情况的维持情况。在治疗组内,使用Wilcoxon检验分析治疗前后数据的比较。通过Mann-Withney-U检验对组间进行比较。P值<0.05被认为具有显著性。与基线相比,两组治疗后下颌运动能力均显著增加,而主观疼痛显著降低(P<0.05)。I组主动张口从28.6±5.8mm增加到35.9±4.8mm,II组从30.1±5.4mm增加到40.8±4.1mm。治疗后两组间主动张口的差异具有显著性(P<0.05)。物理治疗在电子记录过程中对下颌前伸运动能力和主观疼痛程度也有辅助改善作用。对于这些参数,两组间的差异均无显著性。物理治疗似乎对TMD患者的治疗效果有积极影响。