Suppr超能文献

格拉迪斯瓦尔洞穴的地层学、铀钍年代学与古环境:洞察南非含人科化石洞穴沉积物的气候控制因素

Stratigraphy, U-Th chronology, and paleoenvironments at Gladysvale Cave: insights into the climatic control of South African hominin-bearing cave deposits.

作者信息

Pickering Robyn, Hancox Phillip J, Lee-Thorp Julia A, Grün Rainer, Mortimer Graham E, McCulloch Malcolm, Berger Lee R

机构信息

Institute of Human Evolution and School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, PO Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2007 Nov;53(5):602-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.02.005. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

Abstract

Gladysvale Cave is one of the few Plio-Pleistocene hominin-bearing cave sites in South Africa that contains a well-stratified cave fill with clastic sediments interspersed with flowstones. The clastic sediments can be divided into units based on the presence of intercalated flowstones, forming flowstone bounded units (FBU). Ten MC-ICP-MS uranium-series dates on several flowstone horizons in the Gladysvale Internal Deposit fan indicate deposition from the late mid-Pleistocene ( approximately 570 ka) to Holocene ( approximately 7 ka) during limited periods of higher effective moisture. Clastic sedimentation occurred during the interceding, presumably more arid, periods. This sequence is not consistent with earlier models for South African caves that simply assumed interglacial sedimentation and glacial erosion. (13)C/(12)C data suggest that flowstone tended to form during periods with higher proportions of C(3) plants in the local vegetation, while clastic sediments reflect higher proportions of C(4) grasses, although this is not always the case. We argue that flowstones are precipitated during periods of higher effective precipitation and restricted cave entrances, while clastic sediments accumulated during periods with more open vegetation. The sedimentary fill of the fossiliferous deposits are, therefore, highly episodic in nature, with large periods of time unlikely to be represented. This has serious implications for the other hominin-bearing caves close by, as these deposits are likely to be similarly episodic. This is especially pertinent when addressing extinction events and reconstructions of paleoenvironments, as large periods of time may be unrecorded. The Gladysvale Cave fill sediments may serve as a climatically forced chronostratigraphic model for these less well-stratified and well-dated Plio-Pleistocene sites.

摘要

格拉迪斯瓦尔洞穴是南非少数几个含上新世-更新世古人类的洞穴遗址之一,其洞穴填充物分层良好,碎屑沉积物与流石相间分布。根据夹层流石的存在,碎屑沉积物可分为若干单元,形成流石界定单元(FBU)。对格拉迪斯瓦尔内部沉积扇中几个流石层位进行的10次MC-ICP-MS铀系测年结果表明,在有效湿度较高的有限时期内,沉积物的沉积时间从更新世中期晚期(约57万年)至全新世(约7千年)。碎屑沉积发生在其间可能更为干旱的时期。这一序列与早期关于南非洞穴的模型不一致,早期模型简单地假定为间冰期沉积和冰期侵蚀。(13)C/(12)C数据表明,流石往往在当地植被中C(3)植物比例较高的时期形成,而碎屑沉积物则反映出C(4)草本植物比例较高,尽管情况并非总是如此。我们认为,流石是在有效降水量较高且洞穴入口受限的时期沉淀形成的,而碎屑沉积物则在植被更为开阔的时期堆积。因此,含化石沉积物的沉积填充在性质上具有高度的间歇性,不太可能代表很长的时间段。这对附近其他含古人类的洞穴具有严重影响,因为这些沉积物可能同样具有间歇性。在研究灭绝事件和古环境重建时,这一点尤为重要,因为可能有很长的时间段未被记录。格拉迪斯瓦尔洞穴的填充沉积物可作为这些分层较差且测年不完善的上新世-更新世遗址的气候强迫年代地层模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验