Dworkin Robert H, O'Connor Alec B, Backonja Miroslav, Farrar John T, Finnerup Nanna B, Jensen Troels S, Kalso Eija A, Loeser John D, Miaskowski Christine, Nurmikko Turo J, Portenoy Russell K, Rice Andrew S C, Stacey Brett R, Treede Rolf-Detlef, Turk Dennis C, Wallace Mark S
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, USA Imperial College School, London, United Kingdom Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, Germany University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Pain. 2007 Dec 5;132(3):237-251. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.033. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
Patients with neuropathic pain (NP) are challenging to manage and evidence-based clinical recommendations for pharmacologic management are needed. Systematic literature reviews, randomized clinical trials, and existing guidelines were evaluated at a consensus meeting. Medications were considered for recommendation if their efficacy was supported by at least one methodologically-sound, randomized clinical trial (RCT) demonstrating superiority to placebo or a relevant comparison treatment. Recommendations were based on the amount and consistency of evidence, degree of efficacy, safety, and clinical experience of the authors. Available RCTs typically evaluated chronic NP of moderate to severe intensity. Recommended first-line treatments include certain antidepressants (i.e., tricyclic antidepressants and dual reuptake inhibitors of both serotonin and norepinephrine), calcium channel alpha2-delta ligands (i.e., gabapentin and pregabalin), and topical lidocaine. Opioid analgesics and tramadol are recommended as generally second-line treatments that can be considered for first-line use in select clinical circumstances. Other medications that would generally be used as third-line treatments but that could also be used as second-line treatments in some circumstances include certain antiepileptic and antidepressant medications, mexiletine, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, and topical capsaicin. Medication selection should be individualized, considering side effects, potential beneficial or deleterious effects on comorbidities, and whether prompt onset of pain relief is necessary. To date, no medications have demonstrated efficacy in lumbosacral radiculopathy, which is probably the most common type of NP. Long-term studies, head-to-head comparisons between medications, studies involving combinations of medications, and RCTs examining treatment of central NP are lacking and should be a priority for future research.
神经性疼痛(NP)患者的治疗颇具挑战性,因此需要基于证据的药物治疗临床建议。在一次共识会议上对系统文献综述、随机临床试验和现有指南进行了评估。如果至少有一项方法学严谨的随机临床试验(RCT)证明某种药物的疗效优于安慰剂或相关对照治疗,则考虑推荐使用该药物。推荐基于证据的数量和一致性、疗效程度、安全性以及作者的临床经验。现有的RCT通常评估中度至重度强度的慢性NP。推荐的一线治疗药物包括某些抗抑郁药(即三环类抗抑郁药以及5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素双重再摄取抑制剂)、钙通道α2-δ配体(即加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林)以及外用利多卡因。阿片类镇痛药和曲马多通常被推荐为二线治疗药物,在某些特定临床情况下可考虑作为一线用药。其他通常用作三线治疗但在某些情况下也可作为二线治疗的药物包括某些抗癫痫药和抗抑郁药、美西律、N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体拮抗剂以及外用辣椒素。药物选择应个体化,要考虑副作用、对合并症的潜在有益或有害影响以及是否需要迅速缓解疼痛。迄今为止,尚无药物在腰骶神经根病(可能是最常见的NP类型)中显示出疗效。缺乏长期研究、药物之间的直接比较研究、涉及联合用药的研究以及检查中枢性NP治疗的RCT,这些应成为未来研究的重点。