Suppr超能文献

颅内真菌性肿块的外科治疗

Surgical management of intracranial fungal masses.

作者信息

Rajshekhar Vedantam

机构信息

Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

出版信息

Neurol India. 2007 Jul-Sep;55(3):267-73. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.35688.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracranial fungal masses (IFMs, granulomas and abscesses) are uncommon lesions, infrequently encountered by neurosurgeons. There is no conclusive evidence on the ideal surgical management of these lesions.

AIMS

To summarize the recent literature on the prevalence, presentation, surgical management and outcome of patients with IFMs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The recent published literature was searched using standard search engines (PubMed and Google) for articles reporting on the databases and surgical management of IFMs. A special effort was made to include publications from Indian centers.

RESULTS

Intracranial fungal masses were rarely seen even in major neurosurgical centers in India with a prevalence of around one to two per year. While most patients with IFM have immunosuppressed states, nearly 50% of patients with IFMs (especially in India) have no obvious predisposing causes and are apparently immunocompetent. The clinical presentation could be categorized into three groups: 1. Involvement of the cranial nerves 1 to 6 with orbital and nasal symptoms. 2. Focal neurological deficits due to involvement of any part of the neuraxis; and 3. "Stroke-like" presentation with sudden onset of hemiparesis. Based on the presence or absence of radiological evidence of paranasal sinus disease, IFMs were classified into two types: 1. Rhinocerebral type; 2. Purely intracranial type that was further divided into a. intracerebral or b. extracerebral forms. Aspergillus species was the commonest fungal organism causing IFMs but a number of other fungi have been reported to cause IFMs. Surgery for IFMs can be of different types, namely 1. Stereotactic procedures; 2. Craniotomy; 3. Shunt surgery; and 4. Treatment of fungal aneurysms. Generally, radical surgery is advocated for IFMs but there is no unanimity regarding the radicality of the excision especially for the rhinocerebral form of the disease. Surgery should always be followed by antifungal therapy for prolonged periods. Mortality and morbidity in patients with IFMs is very high and ranges from 40-92%. Immunosuppressed patients with IFMs and those in whom the diagnosis is delayed have the highest mortality rates, with immunocompetent patients with the rhinocerebral form of the disease having the best outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

There should be a high index of suspicion for IFMs not only in patients with known risk factors for the development of fungal infections but also in immunocompetent patients in India. Intraoperative pathological diagnosis should be obtained in any patient suspected to have an IFM and tissue should be processed for fungal cultures. Prompt diagnosis, radical and safe surgery and aggressive and prolonged treatment with anti-fungal agents may lead to a better outcome especially in immunocompetent patients.

摘要

背景

颅内真菌性肿块(IFM,肉芽肿和脓肿)是罕见病变,神经外科医生很少遇到。关于这些病变的理想手术治疗尚无确凿证据。

目的

总结近期有关颅内真菌性肿块患者的患病率、临床表现、手术治疗及预后的文献。

材料与方法

使用标准搜索引擎(PubMed和谷歌)检索近期发表的文献,以查找关于颅内真菌性肿块的数据库及手术治疗的文章。特别努力纳入了印度中心的出版物。

结果

即使在印度的主要神经外科中心,颅内真菌性肿块也很少见,每年患病率约为1至2例。虽然大多数颅内真菌性肿块患者处于免疫抑制状态,但近50%的颅内真菌性肿块患者(尤其是在印度)没有明显的诱发因素,且显然免疫功能正常。临床表现可分为三组:1. 累及第1至6对颅神经并伴有眼眶和鼻部症状。2. 因神经轴任何部位受累导致的局灶性神经功能缺损;3. 突发偏瘫的“中风样”表现。根据是否存在鼻窦疾病的影像学证据,颅内真菌性肿块分为两种类型:1. 鼻脑型;2. 单纯颅内型,后者进一步分为a. 脑内型或b. 脑外型。曲霉菌是导致颅内真菌性肿块最常见的真菌,但也有许多其他真菌被报道可引起颅内真菌性肿块。颅内真菌性肿块的手术可分为不同类型,即1. 立体定向手术;2. 开颅手术;3分流手术;4. 真菌性动脉瘤的治疗。一般而言,主张对颅内真菌性肿块进行根治性手术,但对于切除的根治程度,尤其是鼻脑型疾病,尚无一致意见。手术后应始终进行长期抗真菌治疗。颅内真菌性肿块患者的死亡率和发病率非常高,范围在40%至92%之间。免疫抑制的颅内真菌性肿块患者以及诊断延迟的患者死亡率最高,而免疫功能正常的鼻脑型疾病患者预后最佳。

结论

不仅对于已知有真菌感染风险因素的患者,而且对于印度免疫功能正常的患者,都应高度怀疑颅内真菌性肿块。对于任何疑似患有颅内真菌性肿块的患者,都应进行术中病理诊断,并对组织进行真菌培养处理。及时诊断、根治性且安全的手术以及积极和长期的抗真菌药物治疗可能会带来更好的预后,尤其是在免疫功能正常的患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验