Okano Kunihiko, Enomoto Hiroshi, Osaki Makoto, Shindo Hiroyuki
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Oct;128(10):1117-22. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0468-7. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
Advanced-stage osteoarthritis may occasionally be associated with capital drop of the femoral head. In such cases, excision of the capital drop is performed to obtain good congruency with sufficient coverage of the femoral head by rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO). In the present study, we examined the outcome of RAO with excision of the capital drop.
Rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) with excision of the capital drop was performed in 17 hips of 16 patients with a mean follow-up of 12.6 years (excision group), while only RAO was performed in 42 hips of 41 patients with a mean follow-up of 12.3 years (non-excision group). All 57 patients indicated radiographic evidence of advanced-stage osteoarthritis. Clinical follow-up was performed using the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel system. The clinical and radiological results were compared between the two groups.
The mean Merle d'Aubigne and Postel's total hip-joint scores at follow up significantly (p < 0.001) improved compared with the mean pre-operative scores only in the non-excision group. While the numbers of hips in excision group (17 hips) showing progressive and non-progressive osteoarthritic changes were 10 and 7, those in the non-excision group (42 hips) were 11 and 20, respectively. Although none (0/17) in the excision group showed any improvement in osteoarthritic stage at follow up, 11 of 42 hips indicated a favorable outcome in the non-excision group. There were significantly (p = 0.0077) higher improvements in osteoarthritis stage in the non-excision than excision group. Three patients each of the excision group (18%) and non-excision group (7%) underwent total hip arthroplasty during the follow-up period.
Excision of capital drop of the femoral head is not a useful adjunct to the RAO procedure for the treatment of advanced osteoarthritis. Based on results from a previous study, Chiari pelvic osteotomy may serve as a more favorable alternative.
晚期骨关节炎偶尔可能与股骨头的股骨头塌陷相关。在这种情况下,通过旋转髋臼截骨术(RAO)切除股骨头塌陷部分,以实现良好的匹配度,并使股骨头得到充分覆盖。在本研究中,我们检查了切除股骨头塌陷部分的RAO的结果。
对16例患者的17髋进行了切除股骨头塌陷部分的旋转髋臼截骨术(RAO),平均随访12.6年(切除组),而对41例患者的42髋仅进行了RAO,平均随访12.3年(非切除组)。所有57例患者均有晚期骨关节炎的影像学证据。使用Merle d'Aubigné和Postel系统进行临床随访。比较两组的临床和放射学结果。
仅在非切除组中,随访时Merle d'Aubigne和Postel全髋关节评分的平均值与术前平均值相比有显著改善(p < 0.001)。切除组(17髋)中显示进行性和非进行性骨关节炎改变的髋数分别为10和7,而非切除组(42髋)中分别为11和20。虽然切除组中无一例(0/17)在随访时骨关节炎阶段有任何改善,但非切除组的42髋中有11髋显示出良好的结果。非切除组在骨关节炎阶段的改善明显高于切除组(p = 0.0077)。在随访期间,切除组和非切除组各有3例患者(分别为18%和7%)接受了全髋关节置换术。
对于晚期骨关节炎的治疗,切除股骨头塌陷部分并非RAO手术的有用辅助手段。根据先前研究的结果,Chiari骨盆截骨术可能是更合适的替代方法。