Konstantino Yuval, Wolk Robert, Terra Steven G, Nguyen Tu T, Fryburg David A
Cardiovascular, Metabolic Diseases, Pfizer Inc., CT, USA.
Acute Card Care. 2007;9(4):197-206. doi: 10.1080/17482940701474486.
Biomarkers of atherosclerosis are emerging as a potential tool for assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. As acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and stable CAD are distinguished in their pathophysiology it is conceivable that they are also characterized by different biomarkers of atherosclerosis.
We systematically reviewed the literature for clinical studies of several non-traditional biomarkers of atherosclerosis reflecting various pathophysiological processes, namely macrophage-activity, oxidative-stress, tissue remodeling, and thrombosis in ACS and stable CAD to determine whether circulating biomarkers are differently expressed/predict outcome in these two clinical conditions.
Macrophage-activity (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, neopterin), tissue-remodeling (matrix metalloproteinase-9) and thrombosis (tissue-factor) related biomarkers were consistently elevated in ACS compared to stable CAD, in accordance with the pathophysiological role of these mediators in plaque rupture, characterizing ACS. Thus, these biomarkers may be applicable for diagnosis of ACS. Additionally, neopterin was consistently shown to predict outcome in both stable and ACS patients and myeloperoxidase was strongly shown to predict outcome in ACS, implying for their potential role in risk stratification of these patients.
As ACS and stable CAD are characterized by different pathophysiological processes, it appears that the biomarkers that are associated with them are differently expressed in these two clinical conditions
动脉粥样硬化生物标志物正逐渐成为评估冠心病(CAD)患者的一种潜在工具。由于急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和稳定型CAD在病理生理学上存在差异,可以推测它们也具有不同的动脉粥样硬化生物标志物特征。
我们系统回顾了文献中关于反映各种病理生理过程的几种非传统动脉粥样硬化生物标志物的临床研究,这些过程包括巨噬细胞活性、氧化应激、组织重塑和血栓形成,涉及ACS和稳定型CAD,以确定循环生物标志物在这两种临床情况下是否有不同表达/预测预后。
与稳定型CAD相比,ACS中与巨噬细胞活性(单核细胞趋化蛋白-1、新蝶呤)、组织重塑(基质金属蛋白酶-9)和血栓形成(组织因子)相关的生物标志物持续升高,这与这些介质在斑块破裂中的病理生理作用一致,是ACS的特征。因此,这些生物标志物可能适用于ACS的诊断。此外,新蝶呤始终显示可预测稳定型和ACS患者的预后,髓过氧化物酶强烈显示可预测ACS患者的预后,这意味着它们在这些患者的风险分层中具有潜在作用。
由于ACS和稳定型CAD具有不同的病理生理过程,似乎与它们相关的生物标志物在这两种临床情况下有不同表达。