Abrams Peter A, Nakajima Mifuyu
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Zoology Building, 25 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5, Canada.
Am Nat. 2007 Nov;170(5):744-57. doi: 10.1086/522056. Epub 2007 Sep 6.
How does competition between resources affect the interaction between consumer species that share those resources? Existing theory suggests that high resource competition can lead to mutualism. However, this is based on an analysis that need only apply near equilibrium, and experimental demonstrations of such mutualism are rare. Two alternative approaches to measuring food web mutualism are examined here. These are based on the population-level effects of adding or removing a consumer species or on the amount of additional mortality that can be applied to one consumer without excluding it. Both measures suggest that mutualism is likely to be confined to two situations: when overlap in resource use by the consumers is very low and when the consumers are inefficient users of their resources. Competition between resources is also likely to increase the occurrence and magnitude of "hypercompetition" between consumers, where the reduction in population size caused by the introduced consumer is greater than that caused by a consumer that is identical to the resident species. Competition between resources can also increase the negative interaction between consumers by destabilizing the dynamics of the system. Such destabilization can cause negative indirect interactions between specialist consumers having no overlap in resource use.
资源之间的竞争如何影响共享这些资源的消费物种之间的相互作用?现有理论表明,高度的资源竞争可能导致互利共生。然而,这是基于一种仅适用于接近平衡状态的分析,而且这种互利共生的实验证明很少见。本文研究了两种衡量食物网互利共生的替代方法。这些方法基于添加或移除一个消费物种对种群水平的影响,或者基于在不排除一个消费者的情况下可以施加给它的额外死亡率。两种测量方法都表明,互利共生可能仅限于两种情况:消费者对资源的利用重叠非常低时,以及消费者对其资源利用效率低下时。资源之间的竞争也可能增加消费者之间“超竞争”的发生率和强度,即引入的消费者导致的种群数量减少大于与本地物种相同的消费者导致的种群数量减少。资源之间的竞争还可能通过破坏系统动态来增加消费者之间的负面相互作用。这种破坏稳定可能导致在资源利用上没有重叠的专家消费者之间产生负面间接相互作用。