Borowsky Ron, Esopenko Carrie, Cummine Jacqueline, Sarty Gordon E
Cognitive Neuroimaging Lab, Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Brain Topogr. 2007 Winter;20(2):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s10548-007-0034-1. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
There have been several studies supporting the notion of a ventral-dorsal distinction in the primate cortex for visual object processing, whereby the ventral stream specializes in object identification, and the dorsal stream is engaged during object localization and interaction. There is also a growing body of evidence supporting a ventral stream that specializes in lexical (i.e., whole-word) reading, and a dorsal stream that is engaged during sub-lexical reading (i.e., phonetic decoding). Here, we consider the extent to which word-reading processes are located in regions either intersecting with, or unique from, regions that sub-serve object processing along these streams. Object identification was contrasted with lexical-based reading, and object interaction processing (i.e., deciding how to interact with an object) was contrasted with sub-lexical reading. Our results suggest that object identification and lexical-based reading are largely ventral and modular, showing mainly unique regions of activation (parahippocampal and occipital-temporal gyri function associated with object identification, and lingual, lateral occipital, and posterior inferior temporal gyri function associated with lexical-based reading) and very little shared activation (posterior inferior frontal gyrus). Object interaction processing and phonetic decoding are largely dorsal, and show both modular regions of activation (more lateralized to the dorsal-frontal right hemisphere for pseudohomophone naming, and more to the dorsal-frontal left hemisphere for the object interaction task) as well as significant shared regions of processing (precentral gyri, left inferior frontal cortex, left postcentral gyrus, left lateral occipital cortex, and superior posterior temporal gyri). Given that the perceptual experimental conditions show primarily modular and very little shared processing, whereas the analytical conditions show both substantial modular and shared processing, we discuss a reconsideration of "modularity of mind" which involves a continuum between strictly modular processing and varying degrees of shared processing, and which also depends on the nature of the tasks compared (i.e., perceptual versus analytical).
已有多项研究支持灵长类动物大脑皮层在视觉物体处理方面存在腹侧 - 背侧区分的观点,即腹侧流专门负责物体识别,而背侧流在物体定位和交互过程中发挥作用。也有越来越多的证据支持这样一种观点,即存在一个专门负责词汇(即整词)阅读的腹侧流,以及一个在次词汇阅读(即语音解码)过程中发挥作用的背侧流。在此,我们探讨单词阅读过程在多大程度上位于与沿这些流进行物体处理的区域相交或不同的区域。将物体识别与基于词汇的阅读进行对比,将物体交互处理(即决定如何与物体交互)与次词汇阅读进行对比。我们的结果表明,物体识别和基于词汇的阅读在很大程度上是腹侧且模块化的,主要显示出独特的激活区域(与物体识别相关的海马旁回和枕颞回功能,以及与基于词汇的阅读相关的舌回、枕外侧回和颞下回后部功能),并且共享激活很少(额下回后部)。物体交互处理和语音解码在很大程度上是背侧的,并且显示出模块化的激活区域(对于假同音字命名,更多地偏侧于右半球背侧额叶;对于物体交互任务,更多地偏侧于左半球背侧额叶)以及显著的共享处理区域(中央前回、左侧额下回皮质、左侧中央后回、左侧枕外侧皮质和颞上后回)。鉴于感知实验条件主要显示模块化且共享处理很少,而分析条件显示出大量的模块化和共享处理,我们讨论对“心智模块化”的重新思考,这涉及到严格模块化处理和不同程度共享处理之间的连续体,并且还取决于所比较任务的性质(即感知与分析)。