Radicevic Z, Vujovic M, Jelicic L, Sovilj M
Institute for Experimental Phonetics and Speech Pathology, Belgrade, SCG, Gospodar Jovanova 35, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;184(4):529-32. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1119-5. Epub 2007 Oct 13.
Quantitative EEG mapping in powers of electrical activity, concentration of main powers and area of concentration in relation to the side of presentation (left, right, and bihemisphery) and closer location was done on a 24-day-old infant first, and again when the infant was 2.5 months. EEG responses are analyzed in following acoustic modalities: (1) specific (native language speech of mother and unfamiliar female, unfamiliar female speech of foreign language); (2) unspecific (passive period). Familiar and unfamiliar texts present the contents of speech material. Comparative findings on two different ages showed that the infant maintains the processing scheme of unfamiliar stimulus (passive period, foreign language), and also very similar processing scheme of unfamiliar voice regardless if the text in native language is familiar or unfamiliar. During stimulation with familiar or unfamiliar text in native language, which is read by mother, processing type is significantly changed in relation to the age at the time of examination. While a 24-day-old infant shows a similar scheme in processing the familiar and the unfamiliar voices in native language, at the age of 2.5 months, this scheme of processing is changed, especially for theta rhythm, which now has bihemisphery presentation (at earlier stage it has right-side presentation) in the F-C-P region, what is practically the same region where also delta rhythm is processed. However, the sample of unfamiliar voice in native language observed in subsequent period, when the infant was 2.5 months old, maintains the same processing location as it has at an earlier ontogenetic stage, when the infant was 24 days old, regarding the theta rhythm processed in the F-C-P region with right-side presentation, and delta rhythm processed in C-P region with bihemisphery presentation. Post stimuli periods observed when the infant was 2.5 months old show obviously differentiation of theta and delta rhythms' samples and their electrophysiological parameters. The samples of familiar and unfamiliar texts in native language when read by mother (familiar voice) begin to differentiate regarding to closer location and number of centers for maximal powers in theta rhythm at subsequent ontogenetic period (2.5-month-old infant). The samples of quantitative EEG mapping for a 2.5-months-old infant show the signs of complex processing of different stimuli types: known/unknown voice, foreign language, with stronger inclusion of parietal regions, bihemisphery and an increase in number of maximal powers' centers, compared to the samples when the infant was 42 days old. Quantitative EEG electrophysiological parameters are discussed in relation to side representation and closer regional location with the aim of explaining the processing of complex speech and language stimulation in relation to certain characteristics in its bases.
首先,对一名24天大的婴儿进行了与呈现侧(左、右和双侧半球)及更近位置相关的电活动功率、主要功率浓度和集中区域的定量脑电图图谱绘制,当婴儿2.5个月大时再次进行了该操作。脑电图反应在以下声学模式中进行分析:(1) 特定的(母亲的母语语音和陌生女性的语音、陌生女性的外语语音);(2) 非特定的(被动期)。熟悉和不熟悉的文本呈现语音材料的内容。两个不同年龄的对比结果表明,婴儿保持了对陌生刺激(被动期、外语)的处理模式,并且无论母语文本是熟悉还是陌生,对陌生声音的处理模式也非常相似。在用母亲朗读的母语熟悉或不熟悉文本进行刺激时,与检查时的年龄相比,处理类型会发生显著变化。虽然一名24天大的婴儿在处理母语中的熟悉和陌生声音时表现出相似的模式,但在2.5个月大时,这种处理模式发生了变化,特别是对于θ节律,在额中央顶区(F-C-P)现在呈现双侧半球模式(早期阶段为右侧半球模式),而这实际上也是处理δ节律的相同区域。然而,在随后阶段观察到的2.5个月大婴儿的母语陌生声音样本,就F-C-P区域处理的θ节律呈现右侧半球模式以及C-P区域处理的δ节律呈现双侧半球模式而言,保持了与24天大婴儿早期个体发育阶段相同的处理位置。在2.5个月大婴儿观察到的刺激后时期,θ和δ节律样本及其电生理参数表现出明显的差异。在随后的个体发育阶段(2.5个月大的婴儿),当母亲朗读母语中的熟悉和不熟悉文本(熟悉声音)时,关于θ节律中最大功率中心的更近位置和数量,样本开始出现差异。与42天大婴儿的样本相比,2.5个月大婴儿的定量脑电图图谱样本显示出对不同刺激类型(已知/未知声音、外语)进行复杂处理的迹象,包括顶叶区域更强的参与、双侧半球模式以及最大功率中心数量的增加。针对侧部表征和更近区域位置讨论了定量脑电图电生理参数,目的是解释与复杂语音和语言刺激基础中的某些特征相关的处理过程。