Kosmidis P A, Kalofonos H P, Christodoulou C, Syrigos K, Makatsoris T, Skarlos D, Bakogiannis C, Nicolaides C, Bafaloukos D, Bamias A, Samantas E, Xiros N, Boukovinas I, Fountzilas G, Dimopoulos M A
Department of Medical Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ann Oncol. 2008 Jan;19(1):115-22. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm430. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
This phase III study was designed to compare the combination paclitaxel (Taxol)-gemcitabine (PG) versus carboplatin-gemcitabine (CG) in patients with advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer.
Chemotherapy-naive patients with performance status of zero or one were randomized to gemcitabine 1 gm/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus either paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 (arm A) or carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg on day 1 (arm B) every 3 weeks. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response (OR), time to progression and toxicity.
A total of 512 patients were enrolled and 452 eligible (arm A, 225; arm B, 227) were analyzed. All characteristics were well balanced with the exception of vena cava obstruction symptoms and lymph node involvement. Median survival was 9.97 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.74-12.0] for group A and 10.49 (95% CI 9.04-11.94) for group B. There was no difference in the OS, 1-year survival, OR and TtP. However, statistically significant differences were seen in toxicity.
The two regimens are equally active. Myelotoxicity is worse in the CG group whereas alopecia, myalgia and neurotoxicity worse in the PG group.
本III期研究旨在比较紫杉醇(泰素)-吉西他滨(PG)联合方案与卡铂-吉西他滨(CG)联合方案治疗晚期不可切除非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效。
将体能状态为0或1且未接受过化疗的患者随机分为两组,每3周一次,第1天和第8天给予吉西他滨1 g/m²,A组第1天加用紫杉醇200 mg/m²,B组第1天加用曲线下面积为6 mg的卡铂。主要终点为总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括客观缓解率(OR)、疾病进展时间和毒性。
共纳入512例患者,452例符合条件(A组225例,B组227例)并进行分析。除腔静脉阻塞症状和淋巴结受累外,所有特征均均衡。A组中位生存期为9.97个月[95%置信区间(CI)8.74 - 12.0],B组为10.49个月(95%CI 9.04 - 11.94)。OS、1年生存率、OR和疾病进展时间无差异。然而,毒性方面存在统计学显著差异。
两种方案疗效相当。CG组骨髓毒性更严重,而PG组脱发、肌痛和神经毒性更严重。