Taiwo S S, Fadiora S O, Oparinde D P, Olowe O A
Department of Medical Microbiology/Parasitology, College of Health Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, PMB 4400, Osogbo, Nigeria.
West Afr J Med. 2007 Apr-Jun;26(2):97-101.
Typhoid fever has continued to pose considerable health problems world-wide. This problem is made worse by misdiagnosis through the use of a single pretreatment Widal agglutination test in may developing countries.
This is to enable us establish the appropriate titres suitable for a reliable diagnosis of typhoid fever in our environment.
A total of 300 subjects were recruited into the study comprising 260 apparently healthy individuals aged 12 years and above and 40 patients with typhoid fever confirmed by isolation of S. typhi from blood and/or stool. The Widal slide agglutination test method was first used to screen subjects. Serum samples showing agglutination were then serially diluted with 0.85% saline from 1/40 to 1/1280 and subjected to tube dilution.
Thirty-six (13.8%) of the healthy subjects had S. typhi 'O' agglutinin and 48(18.5%) had 'H' agglutinin in their serum while 37(92.5%) of patients with culture-confirmed typhoid fever had 'O' agglutinin and 38(95.0%) had 'H' agglutinin. At a cut-off titre of 'O' agglutinin = 80, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 87.3%, and for 'H' agglutinin = 80, the sensitivity and specificity are 90% and 88.5% respectively. The predictive value of a positive test at 'O' = 80 is 52.2% and of a negative test is 98.3% while the positive predictive value of 'H' = 80 is 54.6% and negative predictive value is 98.3%.
Because of the difficulties in isolating S. typhi from blood, stool or other body fluids in developing countries, a diagnostic Widal agglutination titre of 'O' and 'H' agglutinins = 80 will be considered useful in the diagnosis of typhoid fever in our environment.
伤寒热在全球范围内持续造成相当严重的健康问题。在许多发展中国家,仅通过使用单次治疗前肥达凝集试验进行误诊,使这个问题更加严重。
这是为了使我们能够确定适合在我们的环境中可靠诊断伤寒热的适当滴度。
总共招募了300名受试者参与该研究,其中包括260名12岁及以上的明显健康个体和40名通过从血液和/或粪便中分离出伤寒杆菌而确诊为伤寒热的患者。首先使用肥达玻片凝集试验方法对受试者进行筛查。然后将显示凝集的血清样本用0.85%盐水从1/40连续稀释至1/1280,并进行试管稀释。
36名(13.8%)健康受试者血清中有伤寒杆菌“O”凝集素,48名(18.5%)有“H”凝集素,而37名(92.5%)培养确诊的伤寒热患者有“O”凝集素,38名(95.0%)有“H”凝集素。在“O”凝集素截断滴度为80时,诊断敏感性和特异性分别为90%和87.3%,对于“H”凝集素截断滴度为80时,敏感性和特异性分别为90%和88.5%。“O”=80时阳性试验的预测值为52.2%,阴性试验的预测值为98.3%,而“H”=80时阳性预测值为54.6%,阴性预测值为98.3%。
由于在发展中国家从血液、粪便或其他体液中分离伤寒杆菌存在困难,“O”和“H”凝集素诊断性肥达凝集滴度=80在我们的环境中对伤寒热的诊断将被认为是有用的。