Suppr超能文献

采用液相色谱-串联质谱检测法,比较96孔板形式的固相微萃取和液液萃取用于测定人血浆中药物化合物的情况。

Comparison of solid-phase microextraction and liquid-liquid extraction in 96-well format for the determination of a drug compound in human plasma by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection.

作者信息

Xie W, Pawliszyn J, Mullett W M, Matuszewski B K

机构信息

Department of Drug Metabolism, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007 Nov 30;45(4):599-608. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2007.08.029. Epub 2007 Sep 7.

Abstract

Two sensitive and selective methods based on solid phase microextraction (SPME) and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) in 96-well format, in combination with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) detection have been developed to determine a model drug compound in human plasma. Both assays were performed on an Applied Biosystems-Sciex API 4000 tandem mass spectrometer interfaced with a turbo ion-spray probe and operated in the negative ionization mode. A lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of 1 ng/mL achieved when 0.25 mL of human plasma was processed. In both methods, a stable isotope labeled internal standard was utilized. The methods were validated in the concentration range of 1-500 ng/mL. The intraday precision (%C.V.) of the method using LLE was 0.8% at LLOQ, and was equal to or lower than 3.3% at all other concentrations, while the intraday precision (%C.V.) of the method using SPME was 6.9% at LLOQ, and was equal to or lower than 5.7% at all other concentrations. Based on the direct comparison of the two methods and their successful applications in clinical sample analysis, it may be concluded that SPME may be considered and used as an alternative approach for quantitative determination of drugs in pharmacokinetic studies.

摘要

已开发出两种基于96孔板形式的固相微萃取(SPME)和液液萃取(LLE)的灵敏且选择性的方法,并结合高效液相色谱(HPLC)与串联质谱(MS/MS)检测来测定人血浆中的一种模型药物化合物。两种测定均在与涡轮离子喷雾探头连接并以负离子模式运行的Applied Biosystems-Sciex API 4000串联质谱仪上进行。当处理0.25 mL人血浆时,定量下限(LLOQ)达到1 ng/mL。在两种方法中,均使用了稳定同位素标记的内标。这些方法在1-500 ng/mL的浓度范围内进行了验证。使用LLE的方法在LLOQ时的日内精密度(%C.V.)为0.8%,在所有其他浓度下均等于或低于3.3%,而使用SPME的方法在LLOQ时的日内精密度(%C.V.)为6.9%,在所有其他浓度下均等于或低于5.7%。基于两种方法的直接比较及其在临床样本分析中的成功应用,可以得出结论,在药代动力学研究中,SPME可被视为并用作定量测定药物的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验