Blumenthal James A, Sherwood Andrew, Rogers Sharon D, Babyak Michael A, Doraiswamy P Murali, Watkins Lana, Hoffman Benson M, O'Connell Cara, Johnson Julie J, Patidar Seema M, Waugh Robert, Hinderliter Alan
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Clin Trials. 2007;4(5):548-59. doi: 10.1177/1740774507083388.
Depression is relatively common in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and is associated with worse prognosis. Recently there has been interest in evaluating the impact of treating depression on clinical outcomes. Anti-depressant medications have been shown to be safe and efficacious for many patients; exercise also may be effective for treating depression and may also improve cardiopulmonary functioning. However, methodological limitations of previous studies have raised questions about the value of exercise, and no study has compared the effects of exercise with standard anti-depressant medication in depressed cardiac patients.
UPBEAT is a randomized clinical trial (RCT) funded by NHLBI to evaluate the effects of sertraline or exercise compared to placebo on depression and biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in patients with CHD and elevated depressive symptoms.
The UPBEAT study includes 200 stable CHD patients with scores on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) > or =9 randomized to 4 months of treatment with aerobic exercise, sertraline, or placebo. The primary outcomes include depressive symptoms determined by clinical ratings on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and measures of heart rate variability (HRV), baroreflex control (BRC), vascular function (i.e., flow-mediated dilation (FMD)), and measures of inflammation and platelet aggregation.
This article reviews the rationale and design of UPBEAT and addresses several key methodologic issues that were carefully considered in the development of this protocol: the use of a placebo control condition in depressed cardiac patients, study design, and selection of intermediate endpoints or biomarkers of cardiovascular risk.
This study is not powered to assess treatment group differences in CHD morbidity and mortality. Intermediate endpoints are not equivalent to 'hard' clinical events and further studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these biomarkers.
The UPBEAT study is designed to assess the efficacy of exercise in treating depression in cardiac patients and evaluates the impact of treating depression on important biomarkers of cardiovascular risk.
抑郁症在冠心病(CHD)患者中较为常见,且与较差的预后相关。最近,人们对评估治疗抑郁症对临床结局的影响产生了兴趣。抗抑郁药物已被证明对许多患者安全有效;运动也可能对治疗抑郁症有效,并且可能改善心肺功能。然而,先前研究的方法学局限性引发了对运动价值的质疑,且尚无研究比较运动与标准抗抑郁药物对抑郁症心脏病患者的疗效。
UPBEAT是一项由美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)资助的随机临床试验(RCT),旨在评估与安慰剂相比,舍曲林或运动对CHD且抑郁症状加重患者的抑郁症及心血管风险生物标志物的影响。
UPBEAT研究纳入200例稳定型CHD患者,其贝克抑郁量表(BDI)评分≥9分,随机分为接受4个月有氧运动、舍曲林或安慰剂治疗。主要结局包括通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)临床评分确定的抑郁症状以及心率变异性(HRV)、压力反射控制(BRC)、血管功能(即血流介导的扩张(FMD))测量值,以及炎症和血小板聚集测量值。
本文回顾了UPBEAT的基本原理和设计,并讨论了在制定本方案时仔细考虑的几个关键方法学问题:抑郁症心脏病患者中安慰剂对照条件的使用、研究设计以及心血管风险中间终点或生物标志物的选择。
本研究无足够效能评估治疗组在CHD发病率和死亡率方面的差异。中间终点不等同于“硬”临床事件,需要进一步研究以确定这些生物标志物的临床意义。
UPBEAT研究旨在评估运动治疗心脏病患者抑郁症的疗效,并评估治疗抑郁症对心血管风险重要生物标志物的影响。