Suppr超能文献

不可切除胆管癌化疗生存获益的多中心回顾性分析

A multi-center retrospective analysis of survival benefits of chemotherapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer.

作者信息

Yonemoto Naohiro, Furuse Junji, Okusaka Takuji, Yamao Kenji, Funakoshi Akihiro, Ohkawa Shinichi, Boku Narikazu, Tanaka Katsuaki, Nagase Michitaka, Saisho Hiromitsu, Sato Tosiya

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Yoshida-konoe, Sakyou, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov;37(11):843-51. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hym116. Epub 2007 Oct 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study examined the effect of five systemic chemotherapy regimens on survival in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) as compared with the best supportive care (BSC).

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed data from 413 consecutive patients with BTC who were seen at any of nine central hospitals in Japan between April 2000 and March 2003. Patients were eligible if they had intra- or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer with no prior chemotherapy. Hazard ratios of treatment regimens were estimated using the Cox proportional hazard model and the propensity score method.

RESULTS

Three-hundred and four patients were enrolled: 125 (41.1%) received BSC and 179 (58.9%) took chemotherapy. Of those who received chemotherapy, 58 (19.1%) took gemcitabine (GEM), 45 (14.5%) took a cisplatin (CDDP)-based regimen, 30 (9.9%) took a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimen, 27 (8.9%) took 5-FU + doxorubicin + mitomycin (FAM) and 20 (6.6%) took S-1. The response rate was 8.4% (n = 15). The CDDP-based regimen was associated with a high frequency of toxicity symptoms. The adjusted hazard ratio for GEM in the Cox regression was 0.53 (95% CI 0.34-0.82) and the hazard ratio for the CDDP-based regimen was 0.49 (95% CI 0.36-0.99).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy with GEM may benefit patients with BTC.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了五种全身化疗方案与最佳支持治疗(BSC)对不可切除胆管癌(BTC)患者生存率的影响。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了2000年4月至2003年3月期间在日本九家中心医院中连续就诊的413例BTC患者的数据。入选患者为未接受过化疗的肝内或肝外胆管癌或胆囊癌患者。使用Cox比例风险模型和倾向评分法估计治疗方案的风险比。

结果

共纳入304例患者:125例(41.1%)接受BSC,179例(58.9%)接受化疗。接受化疗的患者中,58例(19.1%)使用吉西他滨(GEM),45例(14.5%)使用基于顺铂(CDDP)的方案,30例(9.9%)使用基于5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)的方案,27例(8.9%)使用5-FU+阿霉素+丝裂霉素(FAM),20例(6.6%)使用S-1。缓解率为8.4%(n=15)。基于CDDP的方案毒性症状发生率较高。Cox回归中GEM的调整后风险比为0.53(95%CI 0.34-0.82),基于CDDP的方案的风险比为0.49(95%CI 0.36-0.99)。

结论

GEM化疗可能使BTC患者获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验