Moreno-Solórzano Isabel, Ibeas-Rollan Rafael, Monzó-Planella Mariano, Moreno-Solórzano José, Martínez-Ródenas Francisco, Pou-Sanchis Edmon, Hernández-Borlan Raquel, Navarro-Vigo Marta, Ortigosa-Rodríguez Silvia, Gel-Moreno Bernat
Servicio de Oncologia, Hospital Municipal de Badalona-BSA, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2007 Sep;6(9):634-40. doi: 10.3816/CCC.2007.n.031.
Phase II/III studies have shown XELOX to be as effective as FOLFOX in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). The study was designed to evaluate the activity and tolerability of XELOX in CRC. In August 2002, we began a prospective study of XELOX as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic CRC. Twenty-two patients were enrolled between November 2002 and August 2003 (series I). An interim analysis performed in August 2003 revealed that 32% of patients required a dose reduction of oxaliplatin because of toxicity. From August 2003 to April 2005, an additional 20 patients were included (series II). This second group of patients received oxaliplatin at a lower dose.
The first 22 patients (series I) included received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus capecitabine 2000 mg/m(2) daily on days 1-15 (3-week cycle). The second set of 20 patients (series II) received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1; the dose of capecitabine and the frequency of administration were not modified.
Patient characteristics were well balanced in the 2 series. Overall response (series I vs. II): 41% vs. 65%; median time to progression was similar: 10.51 vs. 10.92 (log-rank test, P = .79). Median survival was similar in the 2 series: 19.55 vs. 21.18 months (log-rank test, P = .61). Grade 3/4 toxicity (series I vs. II): peripheral neuropathy, 14% vs. 0 (P = .23).
In patients with advanced CRC, in combination with capecitabine, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) is as effective with lower toxicity when compared with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2).
II/III期研究表明,在晚期结直肠癌(CRC)患者中,XELOX方案与FOLFOX方案疗效相当。本研究旨在评估XELOX方案在结直肠癌中的活性和耐受性。2002年8月,我们开始了一项关于XELOX方案作为转移性结直肠癌患者一线治疗的前瞻性研究。2002年11月至2003年8月期间纳入了22例患者(I组)。2003年8月进行的中期分析显示,32%的患者因毒性需要降低奥沙利铂剂量。2003年8月至2005年4月,又纳入了20例患者(II组)。第二组患者接受较低剂量的奥沙利铂。
前22例患者(I组)在第1天接受奥沙利铂130 mg/m²,同时在第1 - 15天每天接受卡培他滨2000 mg/m²(3周周期)。第二组20例患者(II组)在第1天接受奥沙利铂85 mg/m²;卡培他滨的剂量和给药频率未改变。
两组患者的特征均衡。总体缓解率(I组 vs. II组):41% vs. 65%;中位疾病进展时间相似:10.51 vs. 10.92(对数秩检验,P = 0.79)。两组的中位生存期相似:19.55 vs. 21.18个月(对数秩检验,P = 0.61)。3/4级毒性(I组 vs. II组):周围神经病变,14% vs. 0(P = 0.23)。
在晚期结直肠癌患者中,与卡培他滨联合使用时,85 mg/m²奥沙利铂与130 mg/m²奥沙利铂疗效相当,但毒性更低。