Rapid versus intermediate health impact assessment of foreshore development plans.
作者信息
Furber Susan E, Gray Erica, Harris-Roxas Ben F, Neville Leonie M, Dews Carolyn L, Thackway Sarah V
机构信息
Division of Population Health and Planning, South East Sydney and Illawarra Area Health Service.
出版信息
N S W Public Health Bull. 2007 Sep-Oct;18(9-10):174-6. doi: 10.1071/nb07076.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the main differences between conducting a rapid health impact assessment (HIA) and an intermediate HIA on foreshore development plans and their feasibility from a health service perspective.
METHODS
A rapid HIA and an intermediate HIA were undertaken on two foreshore development plans.
RESULTS
The main differences between the two HIAs were in the identification, assessment and decision-making stages of the HIA.
CONCLUSION
While the rapid HIA was less resource intensive than the intermediate HIA, there are several factors that affect the feasibility of conducting this type of HIA within a short time period.
Zotero 插件