Mitsos A P, Corkill R A, Lalloo S, Kuker W, Byrne J V
Department of Neuroradiology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
Neuroradiology. 2008 Feb;50(2):161-70. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0315-0. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
Idiopathic ruptured aneurysms of distal cerebellar arteries (DCAAs) are rare, and their endovascular therapy (EVT) has as yet not been extensively reported. They are usually assumed to result from local arterial wall disruption rather than infection, unlike distal supratentorial artery aneurysms. This study was performed to audit their frequency, potential aetiology and results of EVT.
Using strict inclusion criteria and a database of 1715 EVT patients, we identified ten idiopathic ruptured DCAAs (0.6%) over a 13-year period (1993-2006). The series comprised six males and four females with mean age of 64 years and solitary aneurysms located on posterior inferior cerebellar artery (five patients), anterior inferior cerebellar artery (three patients) and superior cerebellar artery (two patients). Nine aneurysms were fusiform and were treated by endovascular parent artery occlusion, and one was saccular and treated by endosaccular packing. Endovascular therapy was performed with coils in seven cases, n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) in two cases and with both in one case.
Primary EVT was successful in eight patients. One patient died following a procedure-related re-bleeding and one patient required re-treatment after failed endosaccular packing. Nine patients made good or excellent clinical recoveries (modified Rankin Scale 2 or less). Focal cerebellar infarctions were seen on computed tomography images after EVT in three patients, only one of whom was symptomatic with transient dysmetria, which resolved completely during follow up. No aneurysm recanalisation was detected on late follow-up imaging up to 24 months.
Ruptured DCAAs are rare. The majority are fusiform in shape and their aetiology remains uncertain. Endovascular treatment is feasible and effective. It usually requires parent artery occlusion.
小脑远端动脉(DCAA)特发性破裂动脉瘤较为罕见,其血管内治疗(EVT)尚未有广泛报道。与幕上远端动脉动脉瘤不同,它们通常被认为是由局部动脉壁破裂而非感染引起。本研究旨在审核其发生率、潜在病因及血管内治疗结果。
采用严格的纳入标准,基于一个包含1715例接受血管内治疗患者的数据库,我们在13年期间(1993 - 2006年)识别出10例特发性破裂的DCAA(0.6%)。该系列包括6名男性和4名女性,平均年龄64岁,动脉瘤均为单发,位于小脑后下动脉(5例)、小脑前下动脉(3例)和小脑上动脉(2例)。9个动脉瘤为梭形,采用血管内闭塞载瘤动脉治疗,1个为囊状,采用囊内填塞治疗。7例使用弹簧圈进行血管内治疗,2例使用正丁基 - 2 - 氰基丙烯酸酯(NBCA),1例两者联合使用。
8例患者首次血管内治疗成功。1例患者因与手术相关的再出血死亡,1例患者囊内填塞失败后需要再次治疗。9例患者临床恢复良好或极佳(改良Rankin量表评分2分或更低)。3例患者血管内治疗后计算机断层扫描图像上可见局灶性小脑梗死,其中仅1例有短暂性辨距障碍症状,随访期间完全缓解。在长达24个月的后期随访影像学检查中未发现动脉瘤再通。
破裂的DCAA罕见。大多数为梭形,其病因仍不确定。血管内治疗可行且有效。通常需要闭塞载瘤动脉。