Wolf Florian, Schernthaner Rüdiger Egbert, Dirisamer Albert, Schoder Maria, Funovics Martin, Kettenbach Joachim, Langenberger Herbert, Stadler Alfred, Loewe Christian, Lammer Johannes, Cejna Manfred
Department of Radiology, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1180, Vienna, Austria.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 May-Jun;31(3):563-8. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9201-8. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
This paper reports our experience with endovascular techniques for the retrieval of lost or misplaced intravascular objects. Over 12 years, 78 patients were referred for interventional retrieval of intravascular foreign objects. In this retrospective study, radiological procedure records and patients' medical records were reviewed to determine the exact removal procedure in every case, to report success rates, and to identify significant procedure-related complications. Written, informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to the intervention; this retrospective analysis was performed according to the guidelines of the Institutional Review Board. Thirty-six of seventy-eight foreign objects (46%) were located in the venous system, 27 of 78 (35%) in the right heart, and 15 of 78 (19%) in the pulmonary arteries. For foreign object removal, in 71 of 78 (91%) cases a snare loop was used, in 6 of 78 (8%) cases a sidewinder catheter combined with a snare loop was used, and in 1 case (1%) a sidewinder catheter alone was used for foreign object removal. In 68 of 78 (87%) cases, primary success was achieved. In 3 of 78 cases (4%), foreign objects were successfully mobilized to the femoral vessels and surgically removed. In 7 of 78 cases (9%), complete removal of the foreign object was not possible. In 5 of 78 cases (6%), minor complications occurred during the removal procedure. In conclusion, endovascular retrieval of lost or misplaced intravascular objects is highly effective, with relatively few minor complications. On the basis of our findings, these techniques should be considered as the therapy of choice.
本文报告了我们使用血管内技术取出丢失或误置的血管内物体的经验。在12年的时间里,78例患者因血管内异物的介入取出术前来就诊。在这项回顾性研究中,我们查阅了放射学检查记录和患者病历,以确定每例的确切取出过程,报告成功率,并识别与手术相关的重大并发症。所有患者在介入治疗前均签署了书面知情同意书;本回顾性分析是根据机构审查委员会的指导方针进行的。78个异物中有36个(46%)位于静脉系统,78个中有27个(35%)位于右心,78个中有15个(19%)位于肺动脉。对于异物取出,78例中有71例(91%)使用圈套器,78例中有6例(8%)使用侧孔导管联合圈套器,1例(1%)单独使用侧孔导管取出异物。78例中有68例(87%)取得了初步成功。78例中有3例(4%)异物成功转移至股血管并通过手术取出。78例中有7例(9%)无法完全取出异物。78例中有5例(6%)在取出过程中出现轻微并发症。总之,血管内取出丢失或误置的血管内物体非常有效,且轻微并发症相对较少。根据我们的研究结果,这些技术应被视为首选治疗方法。