ter Wee Pieter M, van Ittersum Frans J
Department of Nephrology, Vrije University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2007 Nov;3(11):604-12. doi: 10.1038/ncpneph0620.
Over the past decade new solutions for peritoneal dialysis have been developed in an effort to reduce the bioincompatibility of conventional glucose-containing, lactate-buffered solutions, and thereby to improve the clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis. The new solutions contain either other non-glucose osmotic agents, such as glucose polymers or amino acids, or have a neutral pH; the buffer content is altered in some of the new solutions. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown the biocompatibility of these new solutions to be superior to that of standard solutions. In this paper, available clinical data on the use of these new solutions are reviewed. In general, the data indicate improved biocompatibility of the new solutions; a number of studies, however, detected no superiority when levels of accepted markers of biocompatibility, such as vascular endothelial growth factor or hyaluronic acid, were measured. This finding could be explained by the assumption that the new peritoneal dialysis solutions not only induce less damage to the peritoneal membrane but also better maintain repair mechanisms, which apparently are associated with enhanced release of such markers.
在过去十年中,人们开发了新的腹膜透析溶液,以减少传统含葡萄糖、乳酸缓冲溶液的生物不相容性,从而改善腹膜透析的临床效果。新溶液要么含有其他非葡萄糖渗透剂,如葡萄糖聚合物或氨基酸,要么具有中性pH值;一些新溶液中的缓冲成分有所改变。体外和体内研究表明,这些新溶液的生物相容性优于标准溶液。本文对使用这些新溶液的现有临床数据进行了综述。总体而言,数据表明新溶液的生物相容性有所改善;然而,一些研究在测量生物相容性的公认标志物(如血管内皮生长因子或透明质酸)水平时,未发现其具有优越性。这一发现可以通过以下假设来解释:新的腹膜透析溶液不仅对腹膜的损伤较小,而且能更好地维持修复机制,而这种修复机制显然与这些标志物的释放增加有关。