Chovan William
Psychology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2007 Aug;101(1):61-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.101.1.61-66.
This article offers a critical review of various accepted premises of and persuasive interpretations on whether moral reasoning and personality traits are related. Purposely, this study draws on recent critical examination by Mudrack questioning the paucity of research on the efficacy of a long-established measure of moral reasoning, i.e., Defining Issues Test, together with its relations with basic personality variables of the California Psychological Inventory. Some observations are noted about the validity of tasks that measure personality traits and magnitude of the relation to moral reasoning.
本文对关于道德推理与人格特质是否相关的各种公认前提和有说服力的解释进行了批判性回顾。本研究特意借鉴了穆德拉克最近的批判性研究,该研究质疑了一项长期确立的道德推理测量方法(即界定问题测试)的研究匮乏,以及它与加利福尼亚心理调查表的基本人格变量之间的关系。文中对测量人格特质的任务的有效性以及与道德推理的关系大小进行了一些观察。