Sánchez-Conde Matilde, Palacios Rosario, Sanz José, Rodríguez-Novoa Sonia, Rivas Pablo, Santos Jesús, Sola Julio, Asensi Victor, de Mendoza Carmen, Estrada Vicente, Barreiro Pablo, González-Lahoz Juan, Jiménez-Nacher Inmaculada, Soriano Vincent
Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007 Oct;23(10):1237-41. doi: 10.1089/aid.2006.0029.
The combination of didanosine (ddI) and lamivudine (3TC) is attractive considering its low cost, potency, tolerability, and convenience (once daily administration), but it is not recommended as first-line therapy for HIV infection. A prospective, multicenter, open, comparative trial was conducted in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive persons in Spain who begun a QD regimen with efavirenz (EFV), 3TC, plus ddI, the latter with or without food. A total of 103 patients were recruited in the study. Median baseline CD4 count was 229 cells/microl and plasma HIV-RNA was 4.9 logs copies/ml. In an intent-to-treat analysis, 78 (75.8%) had undetectable viremia at week 48 of therapy, without significant differences when comparing patients on and without fasting ddI (75% vs. 76.6%, respectively). The mean CD4 increase was of 199 cells/microl, with no significant differences between groups. Overall, 29 adverse events were recorded in 23 patients, the majority associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms of EFV. Treatment was discontinued in 10 (9.7%) patients due to adverse events. Virological failure was recognized in only six patients, four taking ddI with and two without food (p = 0.3). Drug resistance mutations were recognised in four of them. Plasma ddI concentrations did not differ significantly between groups. Mitochondrial DNA within peripheral blood mononuclear cells tended to increase in most subjects over 48 weeks of therapy regardless of treatment group. A QD regimen with ddI, 3TC, and EFV shows potency and tolerance similar to that reported using other currently recommended regimens in drug-naive HIV-infected patients. Its efficacy does not seem to be compromised when ddI is administered with food. Therefore, this regimen merits further investigation in larger comparative trials.
去羟肌苷(ddI)与拉米夫定(3TC)联合使用具有成本低、效力强、耐受性好且方便(每日一次给药)等优点,但不推荐作为HIV感染的一线治疗方案。在西班牙,针对未接受过抗逆转录病毒治疗的HIV感染者开展了一项前瞻性、多中心、开放、对照试验,这些患者开始接受每日一次的依非韦伦(EFV)、3TC加ddI的治疗方案,后者服药时进食与否不限。该研究共招募了103名患者。基线时CD4细胞计数中位数为229个/微升,血浆HIV-RNA为4.9 log拷贝/毫升。在意向性治疗分析中,78例(75.8%)患者在治疗第48周时病毒血症检测不到,服用ddI时进食与否的患者之间无显著差异(分别为75%和76.6%)。CD4细胞平均增加199个/微升,各组间无显著差异。总体而言,23例患者记录到29起不良事件,多数与EFV的神经精神症状相关。10例(9.7%)患者因不良事件停药。仅6例患者出现病毒学失败,4例服用ddI时进食,2例未进食(p = 0.3)。其中4例出现耐药突变。各组间血浆ddI浓度无显著差异。无论治疗组如何,大多数受试者在48周治疗期间外周血单核细胞内的线粒体DNA均有增加趋势。ddI、3TC和EFV的每日一次治疗方案显示出与目前推荐用于未接受过治疗HIV感染患者的其他方案相似的效力和耐受性。服用ddI时进食似乎不影响其疗效。因此,该方案值得在更大规模的对照试验中进一步研究。