Suppr超能文献

恒牙列错牙合的评估:口腔内测量的可靠性

Assessment of malocclusion in the permanent dentition: reliability of intraoral measurements.

作者信息

Ovsenik Maja

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2007 Dec;29(6):654-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm084. Epub 2007 Oct 25.

Abstract

Malocclusion assessment methods are based on registrations and measurements made on study casts, which requires that impressions be taken. In addition to being costly and time consuming, this process can be unpleasant for children and adolescents. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of intraoral measurements that compute a malocclusion index score to determine malocclusion severity in permanent dentition. The research was a part of a longitudinal study of 530 3-year-old children. In Slovenia at 14 years of age [mean = 14.8 years, standard deviation (SD) = 0.2], a cohort of 92 children (39 boys and 53 girls) were selected at random in a cross-sectional study. Quantitative registrations of space and occlusal anomalies were performed intraorally as well as on study casts. Kappa (kappa) statistics were used to evaluate agreement between clinical and study cast malocclusion assessment. Systematic bias of measurements was tested using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. The results showed almost complete agreement between the two measurements for anterior crossbite, anterior open bite (AOB), transverse occlusion of the posterior teeth, and crowding (kappa = 0.81-1); excellent reliability for rotation of incisors and canines, for buccal segment relationship, overjet, and axial inclination of teeth (kappa = 0.61-0.80); and for the remainder of the traits the reliability was moderate: vestibular canine eruption, overbite, and midline deviation (kappa = 0.41-0.60). Intraorally small, but statistically significant (P < 0.05) lower scoring of axial inclination of teeth was identified. Overall classification into severity grades, based on total malocclusion score, showed excellent agreement between the two methods ( kappa = 0.84), without statistically significant bias. Malocclusion assessment, recorded and measured intraorally, is as reliable as assessment on study casts. The proposed method can be used in screening, in epidemiological studies, and in clinical orthodontic assessment.

摘要

错牙合畸形评估方法基于对研究模型的记录和测量,这需要制取印模。除了成本高和耗时外,这个过程对儿童和青少年来说可能并不愉快。因此,本研究的目的是评估通过计算错牙合指数得分来确定恒牙列错牙合严重程度的口内测量的可靠性。该研究是一项对530名3岁儿童进行的纵向研究的一部分。在斯洛文尼亚,14岁时(平均年龄 = 14.8岁,标准差 [SD] = 0.2),在一项横断面研究中随机选择了92名儿童(39名男孩和53名女孩)。在口内以及研究模型上进行了间隙和咬合异常的定量记录。使用卡方(kappa)统计量来评估临床和研究模型错牙合评估之间的一致性。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验来测试测量的系统偏差。结果显示,对于前牙反牙合、前牙开牙合(AOB)、后牙横向咬合和牙列拥挤,两种测量方法之间几乎完全一致(kappa = 0.81 - 1);对于切牙和尖牙的旋转、颊侧段关系、覆盖和牙齿轴向倾斜,可靠性极佳(kappa = 0.61 - 0.80);对于其余特征,可靠性为中等:前庭尖牙萌出、覆牙合和中线偏差(kappa = 0.41 - 0.60)。口内测量发现牙齿轴向倾斜得分略低,但具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。基于总错牙合得分进行的严重程度分级总体分类显示,两种方法之间具有极佳的一致性(kappa = 0.84),且无统计学意义的偏差。口内记录和测量的错牙合评估与研究模型评估一样可靠。所提出的方法可用于筛查、流行病学研究和临床正畸评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验