Gulsahi Kamran, Cehreli Zafer C, Onay Emel O, Tasman-Dagli Fugen, Ungor Mete
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Endod. 2007 Nov;33(11):1338-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.015. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
The aim of this study was to compare the cross-sectional area of sealer plus voids of Epiphany sealer surrounding root fillings completed with Resilon cones and laterally compacted gutta-percha. The root canals of extracted human mandibular premolars were prepared to a final size of 40 (0.06 taper). The teeth were then randomly assigned into 2 groups (n = 12/group) for the filling procedures in conjunction with Epiphany sealer: group 1, Resilon cones, and group 2, gutta-percha. Horizontal sections were obtained every 1 mm up to 5 mm from the apical foramen. The sections were digitally photographed under magnification, and the cross-sectional area of the root canal and the area occupied by the sealer and voids were calculated, after which statistical comparisons were made. No differences were found between the sealer plus void or void area of Resilon or gutta-percha groups at any level of sectioning (P > .05). Comparisons within each obturation group showed that there was no significant difference between any level of sectioning with regard to the ratio of sealer plus void area or void area to that of the root canal (P > .05). Within the experimental conditions of the present study, both obturating techniques with the Epiphany sealer exhibited similar amounts of sealer and void area, regardless of the apical level of sectioning compared.
本研究的目的是比较使用Resilon牙胶尖和侧向加压牙胶完成根管充填后,Epiphany封闭剂加根管内空隙的横截面积。将拔除的人下颌前磨牙的根管预备至最终尺寸40(0.06锥度)。然后将牙齿随机分为2组(每组n = 12),使用Epiphany封闭剂进行充填操作:第1组,Resilon牙胶尖;第2组,牙胶。从根尖孔起每隔1 mm获取水平切片,直至5 mm。切片在放大倍数下进行数码拍照,并计算根管的横截面积以及封闭剂和空隙所占的面积,之后进行统计学比较。在任何切片水平上,Resilon组或牙胶组的封闭剂加空隙或空隙面积均未发现差异(P > 0.05)。各充填组内的比较表明,在任何切片水平上,封闭剂加空隙面积或空隙面积与根管面积之比均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。在本研究的实验条件下,无论比较的根尖切片水平如何,使用Epiphany封闭剂的两种充填技术所显示的封闭剂和空隙面积量均相似。