Chin C-L, Tovcimak A E, Hradil V P, Seifert T R, Hollingsworth P R, Chandran P, Zhu C Z, Gauvin D, Pai M, Wetter J, Hsieh G C, Honore P, Frost J M, Dart M J, Meyer M D, Yao B B, Cox B F, Fox G B
Advanced Technology, Global Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064, USA.
Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Jan;153(2):367-79. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707506. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
Activation of cannabinoid CB1 and/or CB2 receptors mediates analgesic effects across a broad spectrum of preclinical pain models. Selective activation of CB2 receptors may produce analgesia without the undesirable psychotropic side effects associated with modulation of CB1 receptors. To address selectivity in vivo, we describe non-invasive, non-ionizing, functional data that distinguish CB1 from CB2 receptor neural activity using pharmacological MRI (phMRI) in awake rats.
Using a high field (7 T) MRI scanner, we examined and quantified the effects of non-selective CB1/CB2 (A-834735) and selective CB2 (AM1241) agonists on neural activity in awake rats. Pharmacological specificity was determined using selective CB1 (rimonabant) or CB2 (AM630) antagonists. Behavioural studies, plasma and brain exposures were used as benchmarks for activity in vivo.
The non-selective CB1/CB2 agonist produced a dose-related, region-specific activation of brain structures that agrees well with published autoradiographic CB1 receptor density binding maps. Pretreatment with a CB1 antagonist but not with a CB2 antagonist, abolished these activation patterns, suggesting an effect mediated by CB1 receptors alone. In contrast, no significant changes in brain activity were found with relevant doses of the CB2 selective agonist.
These results provide the first clear evidence for quantifying in vivo functional selectivity between CB1 and CB2 receptors using phMRI. Further, as the presence of CB2 receptors in the brain remains controversial, our data suggest that if CB2 receptors are expressed, they are not functional under normal physiological conditions.
大麻素CB1和/或CB2受体的激活在广泛的临床前疼痛模型中介导镇痛作用。CB2受体的选择性激活可能产生镇痛作用,而不会产生与CB1受体调节相关的不良精神副作用。为了研究体内的选择性,我们描述了在清醒大鼠中使用药理磁共振成像(phMRI)区分CB1和CB2受体神经活动的非侵入性、非电离功能数据。
使用高场(7T)MRI扫描仪,我们检查并量化了非选择性CB1/CB2(A-834735)和选择性CB2(AM1241)激动剂对清醒大鼠神经活动的影响。使用选择性CB1(利莫那班)或CB2(AM630)拮抗剂确定药理特异性。行为学研究、血浆和脑暴露用作体内活性的基准。
非选择性CB1/CB2激动剂产生了与剂量相关的、脑结构区域特异性激活,这与已发表的放射自显影CB1受体密度结合图谱非常吻合。用CB1拮抗剂预处理而非CB2拮抗剂预处理可消除这些激活模式,表明仅由CB1受体介导作用。相比之下,相关剂量的CB2选择性激动剂未发现脑活动有显著变化。
这些结果为使用phMRI量化CB1和CB2受体之间的体内功能选择性提供了首个明确证据。此外,由于大脑中CB2受体的存在仍存在争议,我们的数据表明,如果CB2受体表达,它们在正常生理条件下无功能。