Ryska M, Strnad R, Belina F, Zavoral M, Sálek C, Hrabal P, Buric I, Lásziková E, Kvicerová H, Jurenka B, Holcátová I
Chirurgická klinika 2. LF UK a UVN Praha.
Rozhl Chir. 2007 Aug;86(8):432-9.
The Czech Republic has the world's highest rates of pancreatic carcinomas. The pancreatic carcinoma is the fourth commonest cause of deaths due to malignancies, in our republic. Resection procedure is currently the only current treatment method, which has a curative potential and significantly prolongs a patient's life.
To assess morbidity, mortality and survival of patients following radical and paliative procedures in the pancreatic head carcinoma patients. METHODS AND PATIENT GROUP: Only patients, who, based on the preoperative staging, were expected to require the following procedures, were indicated for surgery: I radical resection, i.e. stage I, II patients, 2 - palliative resection - i.e. stage III or IV patients, where no angioinvasion was detected preoperatively. Patients with peroperative detection of angioinvasion into the portomesenteric venous drainage area who required partial vein resection, were also included in the above subgroup. 3 - palliative bypass, where longer survival was expected. Radical resection included proximal pancreatoduodenectomy (PDE) with preservation of the pylorus according to Traverso-Longmire, with N1-2 lymphadenectomy and with reconstruction to an excluded jejunal loop. The same procedure was followed in cases of palliative resections. The collected data were statistically assessed using the Logrank test. From 05/1998 to 12/2006, a total of 307 patients with carcinomas of the pancreas and the Vater papila were treated. In 242 patients, the carcinoma was located within the pancreatic head, in 65 subjects, the pancreatic body and cauda were affected. Resection for the pancreatic head carcinoma was performed in 78 patients: 46 males, 32 females, the mean age was 63.5 y.o.a, with the median of 64 years. Bypass procedures were performed in 109 subjects and explorations in 55 subjects.
Surgical procedures, with exception of 55 subjects who underwent exploration only, were performed in 187 subjects. Out of the total 78 PDEs, resections in stage I and II were performed in 22 subjects, in stage III in 41 subjects. In the group of 63 radical resection subjects, 2 subjects exited: the first one due to multiorgan failure, the second one for necrotizing postoperative pancreatitis. In the group of 15 palliative resections, 3 subjects exited. 10 patients died during the early postoperative period after palliative bypass procedures. A total of 15 subjects, i.e. 8%, exited during the early postoperative period. 5 subjects exited after resection procedures, i.e. 6.4%, 3% after radical resections. 3 subjects exited after palliative resections. Early complications were recorded in 44 subjects: pancreato-jejuno anastomosis insufficiency in 6 patients, insufficiency of hepaticojejunoanastomosis in 5 subjects, postoperative pancreatitis in 5 subjects, intraabdominal absces in 10 subjects, wounds infections with secondary healing in 19 subjects and cardiopulmonary complications in 33 subjects. In 19 subjects (43% of all complications), surgical revision was performed. Three-year survival rates were recorded in 60, resp. 29.5 and 39.5% of the patients in stage I, resp. II and III, while they were recorded in 15.6.% of the stage IVa subjects and only in 10.5% of the stage IVb subjects. There is a significant difference between survival rates of the stage I, II and III patients, compared to the stage IV patients (p < 0.005). There is no significant difference in the over- 3-years survival rates between the patients undergoing radical or palliative resections, however, the radical resection patients have significantly higher survival rates 3 months to 2 years postoperatively (p < 0.05). The radical resection subjects have significantly higher survival rates during the first 36 postoperative months, compared to the palliative resection and BDA subjects (p < 0.05). Comparison of sur vival rates in patients with radical or palliative resections is affected by a small number of the palliative resection subjects (n = 15), where no differences in survival rates were detected from the end of 9th postoperative month to the end of 3rd postoperative year. There is a significant difference in the survival rates between the resection and exploration subjects (p < 0.05). The survival rates differences between the subjects with palliative resections and BDAs cannot be evaluated in our study, due to nonhomogenity of the subjects.
Radical PDEs for the pancreatic head carcinoma results in significantly longer survival of the subjects, compared to palliative bypasses. Stage I, II or III patients survive significantly longer, compared to those operated in stage IV.
捷克共和国的胰腺癌发病率位居世界之首。在我国,胰腺癌是因恶性肿瘤导致死亡的第四大常见病因。目前,手术切除是唯一具有治愈潜力且能显著延长患者生命的治疗方法。
评估胰头癌患者接受根治性和姑息性手术后的发病率、死亡率及生存率。
仅根据术前分期预计需要进行以下手术的患者被纳入手术指征:1. 根治性切除,即I期、II期患者;2. 姑息性切除,即III期或IV期患者,且术前未检测到血管侵犯。术中检测到血管侵犯至门静脉肠系膜静脉引流区且需要进行部分静脉切除的患者也纳入上述亚组。3. 姑息性旁路手术,预期生存期较长。根治性切除包括根据Traverso-Longmire法进行的保留幽门的近端胰十二指肠切除术(PDE),行N1-2淋巴结清扫,并重建至排除的空肠袢。姑息性切除病例采用相同手术方式。收集的数据采用Logrank检验进行统计学评估。1998年5月至2006年12月,共治疗307例胰腺和 Vater乳头癌患者。其中242例患者的癌位于胰头,65例患者的胰体和胰尾受累。78例患者接受了胰头癌切除术:男性46例,女性32例,平均年龄63.5岁,中位数为64岁。109例患者接受了旁路手术,55例患者接受了探查术。
除55例仅接受探查术的患者外,187例患者接受了手术。在78例PDE手术中,I期和II期切除22例,III期切除41例。在63例根治性切除患者组中,2例患者死亡:第一例死于多器官功能衰竭,第二例死于术后坏死性胰腺炎。在15例姑息性切除患者组中,3例患者死亡。10例患者在姑息性旁路手术后的早期术后阶段死亡。共有15例患者,即8%,在术后早期死亡。5例患者在切除术后死亡,即6.4%,其中根治性切除术后为3%。3例患者在姑息性切除术后死亡。44例患者出现早期并发症:胰空肠吻合口漏6例,肝空肠吻合口漏5例,术后胰腺炎5例,腹腔脓肿10例,伤口感染二期愈合19例,心肺并发症33例。19例患者(占所有并发症的43%)接受了手术修正。I期、II期和III期患者的三年生存率分别为60%、29.5%和39.5%,而IVa期患者为15.6%,IVb期患者仅为10.5%。与IV期患者相比,I期、II期和III期患者的生存率有显著差异(p < 0.005)。接受根治性或姑息性切除的患者三年以上生存率无显著差异,但根治性切除患者术后3个月至2年的生存率显著更高(p < 0.05)。与姑息性切除和胆肠吻合术患者相比,根治性切除患者术后前36个月的生存率显著更高(p < 0.05)。根治性或姑息性切除患者生存率的比较受到姑息性切除患者数量较少(n = 15)的影响,从术后第9个月末到术后第3年末未检测到生存率差异。切除和探查患者的生存率有显著差异(p < 0.05)。由于患者的非均一性,本研究无法评估姑息性切除和胆肠吻合术患者的生存率差异。
与姑息性旁路手术相比,胰头癌根治性PDE手术可显著延长患者生存期。与IV期手术患者相比,I期、II期或III期患者的生存期显著更长。