Catano Victor M, Turk James
Saint Mary's University, Canada.
Med Law. 2007 Sep;26(3):465-76.
Scientific fraud and misconduct appear to be on the rise throughout the scientific community. Whatever the reasons for fraud and whatever the number of cases, it is important that the academic research community consider this problem in a cool and rational manner, ensuring that allegations are dealt with through fair and impartial procedures. Increasingly, governments have either sought to regulate fraud and misconduct through legislation, or they have left it to universities and research institutions to deal with at the local level. The result has been less than uniform understanding of what constitutes scientific fraud and misconduct and a great deal of variance in procedures used to investigate such allegations. In this paper, we propose a standard definition of scientific fraud and misconduct and procedures for investigation based on natural justice and fairness. The issue of fraud and misconduct should not be left to government regulation by default. The standardized definition and procedures presented here should lead to more appropriate institutional responses in dealing with allegations of scientific fraud and misconduct.
科学欺诈和不当行为在整个科学界似乎呈上升趋势。无论欺诈的原因是什么,也无论案例数量有多少,重要的是学术研究界要冷静、理性地看待这个问题,确保通过公平公正的程序来处理指控。越来越多的政府要么试图通过立法来规范欺诈和不当行为,要么将其留给大学和研究机构在地方层面处理。结果是,对于什么构成科学欺诈和不当行为的理解并不统一,用于调查此类指控的程序也存在很大差异。在本文中,我们提出了科学欺诈和不当行为的标准定义以及基于自然正义和公平的调查程序。欺诈和不当行为的问题不应默认由政府监管。这里提出的标准化定义和程序应能促使机构在处理科学欺诈和不当行为指控时做出更恰当的回应。