Michaels Joseph, Churgin Samara S, Blechman Keith M, Greives Matthew R, Aarabi Shahram, Galiano Robert D, Gurtner Geoffrey C
Laboratory of Microvascular Research and Vascular Tissue Engineering, Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Wound Repair Regen. 2007 Sep-Oct;15(5):665-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00273.x.
The pathophysiology of diabetic wound healing and the identification of new agents to improve clinical outcomes continue to be areas of intense research. There currently exist more than 10 different murine models of diabetes. The degree to which wound healing is impaired in these different mouse models has never been directly compared. We determined whether differences in wound impairment exist between diabetic models in order to elucidate which model would be the best to evaluate new treatment strategies. Three well-accepted mouse models of diabetes were used in this study: db/db, Akita, and streptozocin (STZ)-induced C57BL/6J. Using an excisional model of wound healing, we demonstrated that db/db mice exhibit severe impairments in wound healing compared with STZ and Akita mice. Excisional wounds in db/db mice show a statistically significant delay in wound closure, decreased granulation tissue formation, decreased wound bed vascularity, and markedly diminished proliferation compared with STZ, Akita, and control mice. There was no difference in the rate of epithelialization of the full-thickness wounds between the diabetic or control mice. Our results suggest that splinted db/db mice may be the most appropriate model for studying diabetic wound-healing interventions as they demonstrate the most significant impairment in wound healing. This study utilized a novel model of wound healing developed in our laboratory that stents wounds open using silicone splints to minimize the effects of wound contraction. As such, it was not possible to directly compare the results of this study with other studies that did not use this wound model.
糖尿病伤口愈合的病理生理学以及用于改善临床结果的新型药物的鉴定仍然是深入研究的领域。目前存在10多种不同的糖尿病小鼠模型。这些不同小鼠模型中伤口愈合受损的程度从未被直接比较过。我们确定了糖尿病模型之间是否存在伤口损伤差异,以阐明哪种模型最适合评估新的治疗策略。本研究使用了三种广泛认可的糖尿病小鼠模型:db/db、阿基塔(Akita)和链脲佐菌素(STZ)诱导的C57BL/6J。使用伤口愈合的切除模型,我们证明与STZ和阿基塔小鼠相比,db/db小鼠在伤口愈合方面表现出严重损伤。与STZ、阿基塔和对照小鼠相比,db/db小鼠的切除伤口在伤口闭合方面显示出统计学上显著的延迟,肉芽组织形成减少,伤口床血管减少,增殖明显减弱。糖尿病小鼠或对照小鼠之间全层伤口的上皮化速率没有差异。我们的结果表明,使用夹板固定的db/db小鼠可能是研究糖尿病伤口愈合干预措施的最合适模型,因为它们在伤口愈合方面表现出最显著的损伤。本研究使用了我们实验室开发的一种新型伤口愈合模型,该模型使用硅胶夹板将伤口撑开,以尽量减少伤口收缩的影响。因此,无法将本研究的结果与未使用该伤口模型的其他研究结果直接进行比较。