Suppr超能文献

房室交界区消融及起搏治疗心房颤动后左心室射血分数的保留情况

Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction following atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing for atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Chen Lin, Hodge David, Jahangir Arshad, Ozcan Cevher, Trusty Jane, Friedman Paul, Rea Robert, Bradley David, Brady Peter, Hammill Stephen, Hayes David, Shen Win-Kuang

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Jan;19(1):19-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00994.x. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing creates ventricular dyssynchrony and may compromise left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The impact of RVA pacing in patients who have undergone atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. We sought to determine whether RVA pacing after AVJ ablation for patients with AF compromises LVEF in the short- or long-term.

METHODS/RESULTS: We studied 286 patients with AF who underwent AVJ ablation and RVA pacing at our institution between 1990 and 2002. Patients were stratified into a short-term follow-up group (LVEF reassessed by echocardiography within a year after AVJ ablation, n = 134) and a long-term group (LVEF reassessed after a year, n = 152). Among all 286 patients (mean follow-up 20 months), we observed no change in mean LVEF after AVJ ablation and RVA pacing (48% before vs. 48% after, P = 0.42). Short-term follow-up patients had a statistically significant improvement in mean LVEF (46% before vs. 49% after, P = 0.03), whereas there was no statistically significant change in mean LVEF in long-term follow-up patients (49% before vs. 48% after, P = 0.37). Only 9% of short-term patients, 15% of long-term patients, and 1% of patients with baseline LVEF <or= 40% experienced >or=10% absolute decrease in LVEF. Baseline LVEF > 40% was a multivariate predictor of LVEF decline.

CONCLUSIONS

RVA pacing after AVJ ablation does not compromise LVEF in the short- or long-term for the vast majority of patients. Better predictors are needed to help us select patients for biventricular pacing after AVJ ablation.

摘要

引言

右心室心尖部(RVA)起搏会导致心室不同步,并可能损害左心室射血分数(LVEF)。RVA起搏对因心房颤动(AF)而行房室交界区(AVJ)消融术的患者的影响尚不清楚。我们试图确定AF患者在AVJ消融术后进行RVA起搏是否会在短期或长期内损害LVEF。

方法/结果:我们研究了1990年至2002年间在我院接受AVJ消融术和RVA起搏的286例AF患者。患者被分为短期随访组(AVJ消融术后一年内通过超声心动图重新评估LVEF,n = 134)和长期组(一年后重新评估LVEF,n = 152)。在所有286例患者(平均随访20个月)中,我们观察到AVJ消融术和RVA起搏后平均LVEF无变化(术前48% vs. 术后48%,P = 0.42)。短期随访患者的平均LVEF有统计学意义的改善(术前46% vs. 术后49%,P = 0.03),而长期随访患者的平均LVEF无统计学意义的变化(术前49% vs. 术后48%,P = 0.37)。只有9%的短期患者、15%的长期患者和1%的基线LVEF≤40%的患者经历了LVEF绝对下降≥10%。基线LVEF>40%是LVEF下降的多变量预测因素。

结论

对于绝大多数患者,AVJ消融术后进行RVA起搏在短期或长期内不会损害LVEF。需要更好的预测指标来帮助我们选择在AVJ消融术后进行双心室起搏的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验