Iacopino Anthony M, Taft Thomas B
University of Manitoba Faculty of Dentistry, D113-780 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0W2.
J Dent Educ. 2007 Nov;71(11):1428-34.
Development of common core curricula for the graduate advanced education/specialty programs in dental schools presents significant challenges. Similarities in graduate education accreditation standards justify such an approach, yet a core curriculum is difficult to achieve for a variety of reasons including scheduling constraints and the capacity of a common, single pathway curriculum to address the specific educational needs of postgraduate students in different disciplines. Additionally, many dental schools are experiencing severe shortages of qualified faculty to provide graduate program instruction. There are no previous reports regarding graduate core curricula and the definition/delivery of such core curricula in advanced education programs in dentistry although there are several reports in the medical literature that support the educational value of a unified core curriculum implemented in a modular format. Graduate curricula are typically designed to provide residents with advanced education/training beyond what is acquired during their predoctoral dental school experience. Advanced education programs must emphasize knowledge and skills that are discipline-specific; however, there is a large amount of common foundational material within the early phases of these programs. Dental schools have attempted to identify and present this common material within the context of an organized shared set of courses/seminars where residents from each advanced education program are scheduled simultaneously. However, there have been problems with the implementation of a shared core curricula including the following: 1) dissimilar educational backgrounds/abilities among residents; 2) relevance of material to all residents; 3) lack of central management; 4) scheduling conflicts; and 5) lack of adequate and consistent program evaluation. In an attempt to resolve these problems, a new comprehensive graduate core curriculum was implemented at the Marquette University School of Dentistry in 2000. This core curriculum was designed to 1) be user-friendly; 2) allow flexibility; 3) meet specific programmatic/accreditation needs for each advanced education program; and 4) provide assessment tools for continuous resident feedback and curriculum improvement. Assessment data obtained from residents, faculty, and program directors indicate that this approach has been successful and has transformed graduate education at Marquette. Thus, this model may prove useful for other institutions seeking to refine or develop graduate core curricula.
为牙科学院的研究生高等教育/专业项目制定通用核心课程面临重大挑战。研究生教育认证标准的相似性证明了这种方法的合理性,但由于各种原因,核心课程难以实现,这些原因包括时间安排的限制以及单一通用课程路径满足不同学科研究生特定教育需求的能力。此外,许多牙科学院在提供研究生项目教学的合格教员方面严重短缺。尽管医学文献中有几份报告支持以模块化形式实施统一核心课程的教育价值,但此前尚无关于牙科学高等教育项目中研究生核心课程以及此类核心课程的定义/实施的报告。研究生课程通常旨在为住院医师提供超出其在牙科学院预科阶段所学的高等教育/培训。高等教育项目必须强调特定学科的知识和技能;然而,在这些项目的早期阶段有大量共同的基础材料。牙科学院试图在一组有组织的共享课程/研讨会上识别并呈现这些共同材料,每个高等教育项目的住院医师会同时参加这些课程。然而,共享核心课程的实施存在一些问题,包括以下几点:1)住院医师之间不同的教育背景/能力;2)材料与所有住院医师的相关性;3)缺乏中央管理;4)时间安排冲突;5)缺乏充分且一致的项目评估。为了解决这些问题,2000年马凯特大学牙科学院实施了一项新的综合研究生核心课程。该核心课程旨在:1)便于使用;2)具有灵活性;3)满足每个高等教育项目的特定项目/认证需求;4)提供评估工具以持续获取住院医师的反馈并改进课程。从住院医师、教员和项目主任那里获得的评估数据表明,这种方法是成功的,并改变了马凯特大学的研究生教育。因此,这种模式可能对其他寻求完善或制定研究生核心课程的机构有用。