Nelson Alison
School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Occup Ther Int. 2007;14(4):237-55. doi: 10.1002/oti.236.
This paper aims to critique current occupational therapy practice and theory using Indigenous Australian people as a case example. Critical race theory will be used to help question the privileged position of an occupational therapist from a dominant Westernized culture. In-depth interviews were conducted with 15 (eight female and seven male) Indigenous Australian young people about their perspectives of health and physical activity. In addition, the Kawa model was used as an alternative data-collection tool and detailed field notes and researcher reflections were used as data sources. Preliminary analysis of data is used to illustrate the ways in which critical race theory can inform occupational therapy practitioners and researchers about the ways Indigenous Australian young people view their health. Methodological dilemmas are also discussed. The paper is based on preliminary findings and further analysis needs to continue. Cross-cultural research is inherently complex but can offer those from the dominant culture valuable insights into their taken-for-granted assumptions. Further use of critical race theory may prove useful as the occupational therapy profession continues to evolve its understanding of cultural safety.
本文旨在以澳大利亚原住民为例,对当前的职业治疗实践与理论进行批判。批判种族理论将被用于质疑来自占主导地位的西方文化的职业治疗师的特权地位。对15名(8名女性和7名男性)澳大利亚原住民年轻人进行了关于他们对健康和体育活动看法的深入访谈。此外,川(Kawa)模式被用作替代数据收集工具,详细的实地记录和研究者反思被用作数据源。数据的初步分析用于说明批判种族理论可以如何让职业治疗从业者和研究者了解澳大利亚原住民年轻人看待自身健康的方式。文中还讨论了方法上的困境。本文基于初步研究结果,需要继续进行进一步分析。跨文化研究本质上很复杂,但可以为来自主导文化的人提供关于其视为理所当然的假设的宝贵见解。随着职业治疗行业不断深化其对文化安全的理解,进一步运用批判种族理论可能会被证明是有用的。