Gérvas Juan, Starfield Barbara, Violán Concepción, Minué Sergio
Canencia de la Sierra, Madrid, Spain.
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Nov;57(544):912-7. doi: 10.3399/096016407782317865.
The NHS Plan signalled the creation of GPs with special interests (GPwSIs) in the UK. The role of a GPwSI involves the acquisition of knowledge and skills that enable GPs to dedicate a portion of their time to performing the role of consultants to their colleagues within the ambit of general practice, and with respect to specific health problems encountered. The objectives behind the introduction of GPwSIs are to improve the patient's access to specialist care, to cut waiting-list times, and to save on referral costs, (and as a consequence to increase the prestige of the GPs involved). However, the reality may not meet these expectations. Before accepting the proposition for universal implementation of GPwSIs empirical evidence is required to demonstrate that overall health is improved (of patients as well as the population); patients, especially patients of doctors working alone or in small groups (specifically in rural areas) are not disadvantaged; referral is improved and made more appropriate to the requirements of patients and their health problems; real prestige is generated, not only among GPs and students, but also among patients; biological views typical of the specialist are not promoted; and a brake is not applied to other alternatives in, or the reorganisation of, primary care.
《国民保健服务计划》标志着英国“具有特定专长的全科医生”(GPwSIs)的设立。GPwSIs的职责包括获取知识和技能,使全科医生能够在一般诊疗范围内,就遇到的特定健康问题,将一部分时间用于为同事履行顾问职责。引入GPwSIs背后的目标是改善患者获得专科护理的机会,缩短候诊名单时间,并节省转诊费用,(从而提高相关全科医生的声望)。然而,现实可能无法达到这些期望。在接受全面实施GPwSIs的提议之前,需要有实证证据证明整体健康状况(包括患者和全体人群)得到改善;患者,尤其是由单独执业或小团体执业医生(特别是在农村地区)诊治的患者不会处于不利地位;转诊得到改善且更符合患者及其健康问题的需求;不仅在全科医生和学生中,而且在患者中都能产生真正的声望;不会宣扬专科医生典型的生物学观点;并且不会阻碍初级医疗中的其他替代方案或初级医疗的重组。