Suppr超能文献

有特殊兴趣的全科医生:未解决的问题。

GPs with special interests: unanswered questions.

作者信息

Gérvas Juan, Starfield Barbara, Violán Concepción, Minué Sergio

机构信息

Canencia de la Sierra, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Nov;57(544):912-7. doi: 10.3399/096016407782317865.

Abstract

The NHS Plan signalled the creation of GPs with special interests (GPwSIs) in the UK. The role of a GPwSI involves the acquisition of knowledge and skills that enable GPs to dedicate a portion of their time to performing the role of consultants to their colleagues within the ambit of general practice, and with respect to specific health problems encountered. The objectives behind the introduction of GPwSIs are to improve the patient's access to specialist care, to cut waiting-list times, and to save on referral costs, (and as a consequence to increase the prestige of the GPs involved). However, the reality may not meet these expectations. Before accepting the proposition for universal implementation of GPwSIs empirical evidence is required to demonstrate that overall health is improved (of patients as well as the population); patients, especially patients of doctors working alone or in small groups (specifically in rural areas) are not disadvantaged; referral is improved and made more appropriate to the requirements of patients and their health problems; real prestige is generated, not only among GPs and students, but also among patients; biological views typical of the specialist are not promoted; and a brake is not applied to other alternatives in, or the reorganisation of, primary care.

摘要

《国民保健服务计划》标志着英国“具有特定专长的全科医生”(GPwSIs)的设立。GPwSIs的职责包括获取知识和技能,使全科医生能够在一般诊疗范围内,就遇到的特定健康问题,将一部分时间用于为同事履行顾问职责。引入GPwSIs背后的目标是改善患者获得专科护理的机会,缩短候诊名单时间,并节省转诊费用,(从而提高相关全科医生的声望)。然而,现实可能无法达到这些期望。在接受全面实施GPwSIs的提议之前,需要有实证证据证明整体健康状况(包括患者和全体人群)得到改善;患者,尤其是由单独执业或小团体执业医生(特别是在农村地区)诊治的患者不会处于不利地位;转诊得到改善且更符合患者及其健康问题的需求;不仅在全科医生和学生中,而且在患者中都能产生真正的声望;不会宣扬专科医生典型的生物学观点;并且不会阻碍初级医疗中的其他替代方案或初级医疗的重组。

相似文献

1
GPs with special interests: unanswered questions.有特殊兴趣的全科医生:未解决的问题。
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Nov;57(544):912-7. doi: 10.3399/096016407782317865.

引用本文的文献

6
GPwSIs and ITPs in general practice: a case study in gynaecology.
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Feb;63(607):99-100. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X663181.

本文引用的文献

6
Western European best practice in primary healthcare.西欧初级医疗保健的最佳实践。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2006;12(1):30-3. doi: 10.1080/13814780600757187.
7
Primary care--will it survive?初级保健——它能存续下去吗?
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):861-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068155.
9
General practitioners with special interests: evolution and evaluation.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Apr;11(2):106-9. doi: 10.1258/135581906776318929.
10
Pay-for-performance: the MedPAC perspective.按绩效付费:医疗保险支付咨询委员会的观点
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Mar-Apr;25(2):413-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.2.413.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验