Abstract
Progress on the 18-week target is difficult to measure due to a lack of available information. A lack of alignment between the target and available IT support is a key reason for the lack of progress. Electronic access to information on patient pathways is crucial to achieving the target.
摘要
相似文献
1
The waiting game.
Health Serv J. 2007 Sep 6;117(6072):suppl 8-10.
2
Waiting times. Early runners set to be first past 18-week post.
Health Serv J. 2007 Dec 6;117(6085):16-7.
3
Targets. What's the diagnosis?
Health Serv J. 2005 Jun 23;115(5961):suppl 2-4.
4
Cuts threaten 18-week wait target.
Health Serv J. 2006 Apr 6;116(6000):9.
5
On the fiddle.
Health Serv J. 2003 Mar 27;113(5848):12-3.
6
How to take control of waiting lists.
Health Serv J. 2012 May 24;122(6307):16-7.
7
Worth the wait.
Health Serv J. 2004 Mar 18;114(5897):12-3.
8
Waiting times. Catch up, keep up.
Health Serv J. 2003 Apr 3;113(5849):24-7.
9
Clinical management. Failure is not an option.
Health Serv J. 2005 Sep 22;115(5974):30-32.
10
Waiting-time targets in the healthcare sector: how long are we waiting?
J Health Econ. 2009 Dec;28(6):1081-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
Zotero 插件