Suppr超能文献

与氯吡格雷相比,首个可逆性口服二磷酸腺苷受体拮抗剂AZD6140在非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者中的安全性、耐受性及初始疗效:DISPERSE-2试验的主要结果

Safety, tolerability, and initial efficacy of AZD6140, the first reversible oral adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, compared with clopidogrel, in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: primary results of the DISPERSE-2 trial.

作者信息

Cannon Christopher P, Husted Steen, Harrington Robert A, Scirica Benjamin M, Emanuelsson Håkan, Peters Gary, Storey Robert F

机构信息

TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Nov 6;50(19):1844-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.053. Epub 2007 Oct 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to compare the safety and initial efficacy of AZD6140, the first reversible oral adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, with clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS).

BACKGROUND

AZD6140 achieves higher mean levels of platelet inhibition than clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

METHODS

A total of 990 patients with NSTE-ACS, treated with aspirin and standard therapy for ACS, were randomized in a 1:1:1 double-blind fashion to receive either twice-daily AZD6140 90 mg, AZD6140 180 mg, or clopidogrel 300-mg loading dose plus 75 mg once daily for up to 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The primary end point, the Kaplan-Meier rate of major or minor bleeding through 4 weeks, was 8.1% in the clopidogrel group, 9.8% in the AZD6140 90-mg group, and 8.0% in the AZD6140 180-mg group (p = 0.43 and p = 0.96, respectively, vs. clopidogrel); the major bleeding rates were 6.9%, 7.1%, and 5.1%, respectively (p = 0.91 and p = 0.35, respectively, vs. clopidogrel). Although not statistically significant, favorable trends were seen in the Kaplan-Meier rates of myocardial infarction (MI) over the entire study period (MI: 5.6%, 3.8%, and 2.5%, respectively; p = 0.41 and p = 0.06, respectively, vs. clopidogrel). In a post-hoc analysis of continuous electrocardiograms, mostly asymptomatic ventricular pauses >2.5 s were more common, especially in the AZD6140 180-mg group (4.3%, 5.5%, and 9.9%, respectively; p = 0.58 and p = 0.01, respectively, vs. clopidogrel).

CONCLUSIONS

This initial experience with AZD6140 in patients with ACS showed no difference in major bleeding but an increase in minor bleeding at the higher dose with encouraging results on the secondary end point of MI. This agent is currently being studied in a large outcomes trial in 18,000 patients with ACS.

摘要

目的

我们的目标是比较首个可逆性口服二磷酸腺苷受体拮抗剂 AZD6140 与氯吡格雷在非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者中的安全性和初始疗效。

背景

在稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者中,AZD6140 实现的血小板抑制平均水平高于氯吡格雷。

方法

总共 990 例接受阿司匹林和 ACS 标准治疗的 NSTE-ACS 患者,以 1:1:1 的双盲方式随机分组,分别接受每日两次 90 毫克的 AZD6140、180 毫克的 AZD6140,或氯吡格雷 300 毫克负荷剂量加每日一次 75 毫克,持续 12 周。

结果

主要终点,即 4 周内主要或轻微出血的 Kaplan-Meier 发生率,氯吡格雷组为 8.1%,AZD6140 90 毫克组为 9.8%,AZD6140 180 毫克组为 8.0%(与氯吡格雷相比,p 值分别为 0.43 和 0.96);主要出血率分别为 6.9%、7.1%和 5.1%(与氯吡格雷相比,p 值分别为 0.91 和 0.35)。尽管无统计学显著性差异,但在整个研究期间,心肌梗死(MI)的 Kaplan-Meier 发生率呈现出有利趋势(MI 发生率分别为 5.6%、3.8%和 2.5%;与氯吡格雷相比,p 值分别为 0.41 和 0.06)。在连续心电图的事后分析中,大多无症状的心室停顿>2.5 秒更为常见,尤其是在 AZD6140 180 毫克组(分别为 4.3%、5.5%和 9.9%;与氯吡格雷相比,p 值分别为 0.58 和 0.01)。

结论

AZD6140 在 ACS 患者中的这一初步经验表明,主要出血方面无差异,但高剂量时轻微出血增加,在 MI 次要终点方面取得了令人鼓舞的结果。该药物目前正在一项针对 18000 例 ACS 患者的大型结局试验中进行研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验