Chen Z Jay, Deng Jun, Roberts Kenneth, Nath Ravinder
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208040, New Haven, CT 06510-1234, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.007. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
Surgical trauma-induced edema and its protracted resolution can lead to significant dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy. The purpose of this work was to examine whether these dose reductions should be actively compensated for and to estimate the magnitude of the additional irradiation needed for dose compensation.
The quantitative edema resolution characteristics observed by Waterman et al. were used to examine the physical and radiobiologic effects of prostate edema in preplanned (131)Cs implants. The need for dose compensation was assessed using the dose responses observed in (125)I and (103)Pd prostate implants. The biologically effective dose, calculated with full consideration of edema evolution, was used to estimate the additional irradiation needed for dose compensation.
We found that the edema-induced dose reduction in preplanned (131)Cs implants could easily exceed 10% of the prescription dose for implants with moderate or large edema. These dose reductions could lead to a >10% reduction in the biochemical recurrence-free survival for individual patients if the effect of edema was ignored. For a prescribed dose of 120 Gy, the number of 2-Gy external beam fractions needed to compensate for a 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% edema-induced dose reduction would be one, four, six, seven, and nine, respectively, for prostate cancer with a median potential doubling time of 42 days. The required additional irradiation increased for fast-growing tumors and/or those less efficient in sublethal damage repair.
Compensation of edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy should be actively considered for those implants with moderate or large edema.
手术创伤引起的水肿及其持久消退可导致预先计划的¹³¹Cs前列腺近距离放射治疗中的剂量显著降低。本研究的目的是检查是否应积极补偿这些剂量降低,并估计剂量补偿所需的额外照射量。
采用沃特曼等人观察到的定量水肿消退特征,来研究预先计划的¹³¹Cs植入中前列腺水肿的物理和放射生物学效应。使用¹²⁵I和¹⁰³Pd前列腺植入中观察到的剂量反应来评估剂量补偿的必要性。充分考虑水肿演变计算的生物有效剂量,用于估计剂量补偿所需的额外照射量。
我们发现,对于中度或大量水肿的植入,预先计划的¹³¹Cs植入中水肿引起的剂量降低很容易超过处方剂量的10%。如果忽略水肿的影响,这些剂量降低可能导致个体患者生化无复发生存率降低>10%。对于120 Gy的处方剂量,对于中位潜在倍增时间为42天的前列腺癌,补偿5%、10%、15%、20%和25%水肿引起的剂量降低所需的2 Gy外照射分次数量分别为1次、4次、6次、7次和9次。对于生长迅速的肿瘤和/或亚致死损伤修复效率较低的肿瘤,所需的额外照射量会增加。
对于中度或大量水肿的¹³¹Cs前列腺近距离放射治疗植入,应积极考虑补偿水肿引起的剂量降低。