Gamma钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折两种手术方法的疗效比较
[Comparison of effects between two operating methods of treating intertrochanteric hip fracture with Gamma nail fixation].
作者信息
Chen Qin, Zhou Zheng, Guan Long
机构信息
Department of Orthopedics, Chengdu Third People's Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan 610031, PR China.
出版信息
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Oct;21(10):1027-30.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the surgical efficiency of treating the intertrochanteric hip fracture with the Gamma nail fixation and to compare two operating methods of the Gamma nail fixation.
METHODS
From August 2000 to August 2006, 69 patients (32 males, 37 females; age, 43-98 years;average, 72.3 years) with the intertrochanteric hip fracture but with no associated injury were treated with the Gamma nail fixation. The patients' average illness course was 5. 6 days (range, 3-14 days). Among the 69 patients, 36 were treated with the traditional method of the Gamma nail fixation (Group A) and 33 were treated with an improved method of the Gamma nail fixation (Group B). According to the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO-ASIF) classification, in Group A, 5 patients had a disease of Type A1, 23 of Type A2, and 8 of Type A3; in Group B, 8 patients had a disease of Type A1, 21 of Type A2, and 4 of Type A3. The data from the two groups were analyzed, and the statistical analysis was made on the following aspects: incision length, operating time, intraoperative bleeding, X-ray exposure frequency, drainage amount, blood transfusion volume, postoperative infection of the lungs, superficial infection of the incision, duration of antibiotic use, standing with the walking stick after operation, complication due to internal fixation, healing time for the fracture, and the hip function recovery half a year after operation assessed with the Harris scoring system.
RESULTS
All the 69 patients were followed up for 8-80 months (average, 42 months). We studied the indexes such as incision length, operating time, intraoperative bleeding, X-ray exposure frequency, drainage amount, and blood transfusion volum; above indexes in Group A were 9.5 +/- 4.7 cm, 85 +/- 35 min, 186.0 +/- 87.3 ml, 9.0 +/- 5.1 times, 102.7 +/- 49.8 ml, 325.0 +/- 169.5 ml; and those were 5.3 +/- 1.2 cm, 46 +/- 10 min, 65.0 +/- 26.0 ml, 3.0 +/- 2.1 times, 52.5 +/- 16.2 ml, 203.0 +/- 61.2 ml in Group B. The above indexes showed that the surgical efficiency in Group B was significantly better than that in Group A (P < 0. 05). The postoperative recovery indexes such as infection of the lungs, infection of the incision, duration of antibiotic use, standing time after operation, union time of fracture, and function score, were studied. There was a statistically significiant difference in lung infection, incision infection, duration of antibiotic use, and standing time after operation between Group A and Group B (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The improved method of the Gamma nail fixation for treating the intertrochanteric hip fracture can increase the surgical efficiency and improve the patient's early recovery after operation, especially suitable for the elderly patients who have more complications. This kind of method can shorten the operating time and the anesthesia duration, reducing the incision infection and the blood loss during operation, and decrease the frequency of the X-ray use.
目的
评估Gamma钉固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的手术疗效,并比较Gamma钉固定的两种手术方法。
方法
2000年8月至2006年8月,对69例无合并伤的股骨粗隆间骨折患者(男32例,女37例;年龄43 - 98岁,平均72.3岁)采用Gamma钉固定治疗。患者平均病程5.6天(范围3 - 14天)。69例患者中,36例采用传统Gamma钉固定方法治疗(A组),33例采用改良Gamma钉固定方法治疗(B组)。按照国际内固定研究学会(AO - ASIF)分类,A组中,A1型5例,A2型23例,A3型8例;B组中,A1型8例,A2型21例,A3型4例。对两组数据进行分析,并在以下方面进行统计学分析:切口长度、手术时间、术中出血、X线透视次数、引流量、输血量、术后肺部感染、切口浅表感染、抗生素使用时间、术后扶拐站立情况、内固定并发症、骨折愈合时间以及术后半年用Harris评分系统评估的髋关节功能恢复情况。
结果
69例患者均获随访8 - 80个月(平均42个月)。研究了切口长度、手术时间、术中出血、X线透视次数、引流量及输血量等指标;A组上述指标分别为9.5±4.7cm、85±35分钟、186.0±87.3ml、9.0±5.1次、102.7±49.8ml、325.0±169.5ml;B组分别为5.3±1.2cm、46±10分钟、65.0±26.0ml、3.0±2.1次、52.5±16.2ml、203.0±61.2ml。上述指标显示B组手术疗效明显优于A组(P < 0.05)。研究了术后恢复指标如肺部感染、切口感染、抗生素使用时间、术后站立时间、骨折愈合时间及功能评分等。A组与B组在肺部感染、切口感染、抗生素使用时间及术后站立时间方面存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.05)。
结论
改良Gamma钉固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折可提高手术疗效,改善患者术后早期恢复情况,尤其适用于并发症较多的老年患者。该方法可缩短手术时间和麻醉时间,减少手术中切口感染和出血,降低X线使用频率。