Bouville Mathieu
Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, Singapore, Singapore.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2008 Jun;14(2):279-90. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9038-1. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
Many people hold this truth to be self-evident that universities should enroll more female students in science and engineering; the main question then being how. Typical arguments include possible benefits to women, possible benefits to the economy, and the unfairness of the current female under-representation. However, when clearly stated and scrutinized these arguments in fact lead to the conclusion that there should be more women in scientific disciplines in higher education in the sense that we should expect more women (which various kinds of discrimination may prevent), not that we should actively enroll more women. Outreach programs towards high school students may therefore be logically incompatible with the arguments supposed to justify them. They should purport to allow women to graduate in a field congruent with her abilities and desires, rather than try to draw as many of them to scientific disciplines as possible: one cannot try to 'recruit' as many female students as possible while claiming to help them choose more freely.
许多人认为这是不言而喻的事实,即大学应该招收更多的理工科女生;那么主要问题就在于如何去做。典型的论据包括对女性可能带来的益处、对经济可能带来的益处,以及当前女性代表性不足的不公平性。然而,当这些论据被清晰阐述并仔细审视时,实际上会得出这样的结论:从我们应该期望有更多女性(尽管各种歧视可能会阻碍她们)的意义上来说,高等教育的科学学科中应该有更多女性,但并非说我们应该积极招收更多女性。因此,针对高中生的外展项目在逻辑上可能与用以证明其合理性的论据不相容。这些项目应该旨在让女性在与其能力和愿望相符的领域毕业,而不是试图吸引尽可能多的女性进入科学学科:人们不能在声称帮助她们更自由地选择的同时,又试图“招募”尽可能多的女学生。