Brauer C A, Graham B
Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007 Dec;32(6):654-62. doi: 10.1016/J.JHSE.2007.07.001. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
The objective of our study was to use decision analysis to compare four common surgical treatments for cubital tunnel syndrome: simple decompression of the cubital tunnel, medial epicondylectomy, anterior subcutaneous transposition and anterior submuscular transposition. The variables used for this decision analysis model were based on data from the literature. Extensive sensitivity analyses were carried out to test the impact of the values given to these variables on the outcome of the model. The highest expected utility, 0.973, was associated with simple decompression. The expected utility was 0.969 for subcutaneous transposition and 0.965 for submuscular transposition. Medial epicondylectomy had the lowest expected utility at 0.961. Simple decompression remained the preferred strategy in extensive one-way sensitivity analyses.
单纯肘管减压术、内上髁切除术、皮下前置术和肌下前置术。该决策分析模型所使用的变量基于文献数据。我们进行了广泛的敏感性分析,以测试赋予这些变量的值对模型结果的影响。单纯减压术的预期效用最高,为0.973。皮下前置术的预期效用为0.969,肌下前置术为0.965。内上髁切除术的预期效用最低,为0.961。在广泛的单向敏感性分析中,单纯减压术仍然是首选策略。