Suppr超能文献

食品中大豆过敏原的检测与定量:两种商用酶联免疫吸附测定法的研究

Detection and quantification of soy allergens in food: study of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

作者信息

L'Hocine Lamia, Boye Joyce Irene, Munyana Christella

机构信息

Food Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Casavant Blvd. West, St Hyacinthe, QC, J2S 8E3, Canada.

出版信息

J Food Sci. 2007 Apr;72(3):C145-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00298.x.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 2 commercially available soy enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and use them in detecting soy proteins in selected food commodities. Both ELISA kits exhibited high sensitivity. The determined limits of detection (LOD) (approximately 2 and <1 microg/mL for Tepnel Biosystems and Elisa Systems kits, respectively) were lower than those claimed by the manufacturer. Quantification range for both kits was, however, narrower and in a lower concentration range than defined by the kit providers. Our examination revealed a positive cross-reactivity with chickpea proteins and matrix interferences for both kits. The immunoreactivity of soy proteins, when tested by the Tepnel Biosystems kit, was partially reduced by papain and bromelain hydrolysis; it was significantly decreased by protein glycation (>47%). Nondenatured and nonheated soy protein isolate (SPI) samples were also significantly less antigenic than the treated ones.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估两种市售大豆酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)的功效,并将其用于检测选定食品中的大豆蛋白。两种ELISA试剂盒均表现出高灵敏度。所测定的检测限(LOD)(Tepnel Biosystems试剂盒约为2 μg/mL,Elisa Systems试剂盒<1 μg/mL)低于制造商声称的检测限。然而,两种试剂盒的定量范围均比试剂盒供应商定义的范围更窄且浓度范围更低。我们的检测发现,两种试剂盒均与鹰嘴豆蛋白存在阳性交叉反应以及基质干扰。用Tepnel Biosystems试剂盒检测时,大豆蛋白的免疫反应性会因木瓜蛋白酶和菠萝蛋白酶水解而部分降低;因蛋白质糖基化(>47%)而显著降低。未变性和未加热的大豆分离蛋白(SPI)样品的抗原性也明显低于经处理的样品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验