Alanay Ahmet, Wang Jeffrey C, Shamie A Nick, Napoli Antonia, Chen Chihui, Tsou Paul
Department of Orthopaedics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):789-95. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.009. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
The safety of allograft material has come under scrutiny because of recent reports of allograft-associated bacterial and viral infections in tissue recipients. Gamma irradiation, although being one of the most effective ways of terminal sterilization, has been shown to affect the biomechanical properties of allograft bone. It may also have detrimental effects on the osteoinductivity of allograft material such as demineralized bone matrix (DBM) by the denaturation of proteins because of heat generated by irradiation. Sterilization of DBM material is an important variable in processing graft materials. This is considered to be one of the factors leading to different fusion rates observed with different commercially available DBM products, as the sterilization procedure itself may affect the osteoinductivity of the material. Currently, there is no ideal sterilization technique that limits the detrimental effect on osteoinductivity and fusion rates.
To evaluate the effects of a range of hydrogen peroxide exposures with or without the controlled high-dose gamma irradiation after processing with radioprotectant solutions (Clearant radiation sterilization procedure) on the fusion rates of human DBM.
A prospective in vivo animal study.
Eighty mature athymic nude female rats were used for this study, which formed 10 equal groups. Human DBM exposed to hydrogen peroxide for different time periods (0, 1, 6, and 24 hours) was divided into two major subgroups. One group was further treated with controlled high-dose radiation using radioprotectants (radiation treated), whereas the other group was frozen immediately without specific treatment (non-radiation treated). Both radiation-treated and non-radiation-treated DBM material from each group of hydrogen peroxide exposure times were implanted between L4 and L5 transverse processes of the rats forming eight test groups including eight animals in each. The remaining 16 rats were divided into two additional groups to form negative (only decortication, n=8) and positive (bone morphogenetic protein [BMP]-2, n=8) control groups. The rats were evaluated for fusion by radiographs (2, 4, and 8 weeks), manual palpation (8 weeks), and histological analysis after sacrificing. Comparison of fusion rate among all groups was made using these three evaluation methods.
Increasing the time period of hydrogen peroxide (0, 1, 6, or 24 hours) exposure for preparation of DBM from bone allograft did not affect the fusion rates significantly (p<.05), although there was a trend toward decreasing fusion rates with longer exposure times. When the hydrogen peroxide washed DBM preparations were also radiation treated, the resulting fusion rates were again not significantly different (p<.05). Agreement among fusion detection methods was found to be high.
Hydrogen peroxide processing was not detrimental to fusion rates. The additional terminal sterilization technique with special gamma irradiation protocols (Clearant process) also did not decrease the fusion rates but could provide an additional margin of safety.
由于近期有报道称组织接受者中出现同种异体移植相关的细菌和病毒感染,同种异体移植材料的安全性受到了严格审查。γ射线辐照虽然是终末灭菌最有效的方法之一,但已被证明会影响同种异体骨的生物力学性能。它还可能因辐照产生的热量导致蛋白质变性,从而对同种异体移植材料(如脱矿骨基质[DBM])的骨诱导活性产生有害影响。DBM材料的灭菌是处理移植材料的一个重要变量。这被认为是导致不同市售DBM产品观察到不同融合率的因素之一,因为灭菌程序本身可能会影响材料的骨诱导活性。目前,尚无理想的灭菌技术能限制对骨诱导活性和融合率的有害影响。
评估在用辐射防护剂溶液处理后(Clearant辐射灭菌程序),一系列不同过氧化氢暴露时间(有或无受控高剂量γ射线辐照)对人DBM融合率的影响。
一项前瞻性体内动物研究。
本研究使用了80只成熟的雌性无胸腺裸鼠,分为10个相等的组。将暴露于不同时间段(0、1、6和24小时)过氧化氢的人DBM分为两个主要亚组。一组进一步用辐射防护剂进行受控高剂量辐射处理(辐射处理组),而另一组立即冷冻,不进行特殊处理(非辐射处理组)。来自每个过氧化氢暴露时间组的经辐射处理和未经辐射处理的DBM材料分别植入大鼠L4和L5横突之间,形成8个试验组,每组8只动物。其余16只大鼠分为另外两组,形成阴性(仅去皮质,n = 8)和阳性(骨形态发生蛋白[BMP]-2,n = 8)对照组。通过X线片(2、4和8周)、手动触诊(8周)以及处死后的组织学分析对大鼠的融合情况进行评估。使用这三种评估方法对所有组的融合率进行比较。
增加用于从同种异体骨制备DBM的过氧化氢暴露时间(0、1、6或24小时)对融合率没有显著影响(p <.05),尽管随着暴露时间延长有融合率下降的趋势。当过氧化氢冲洗后的DBM制剂也进行辐射处理时,最终的融合率同样没有显著差异(p <.05)。发现融合检测方法之间的一致性很高。
过氧化氢处理对融合率无害。采用特殊γ射线辐照方案的额外终末灭菌技术(Clearant程序)也没有降低融合率,但可提供额外的安全保障。