Semins Michelle Jo, Trock Bruce J, Matlaga Brian R
James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):194-7; discussion 197. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.173. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
Although experimental evidence suggests that the rate of shock wave delivery can affect the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy, clinical studies produce conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to define the effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.
A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed and all randomized controlled trials comparing SWL treatment at 60 shocks per minute to 120 shocks per minute were included in the analysis. Data from 4 trials (589 patients) were pooled. The primary outcome measure was treatment outcome (success, failure), as defined by the authors of the source studies. The difference in the proportion of patients with a successful treatment outcome was compared between the 60 and 120 shocks per minute groups as a risk difference, and risk differences were pooled across the 4 trials with a fixed effects model.
Patients treated at a rate of 60 shocks per minute had a significantly greater likelihood of a successful treatment (risk difference 10.2, 95% CI 3.7-16.8, p = 0.002).
Our meta-analysis suggests that patients treated at a rate of 60 shocks per minute have a significantly greater likelihood of a successful treatment outcome than patients treated at a rate of 120 shocks per minute.
尽管实验证据表明冲击波释放速率可能会影响冲击波碎石术的治疗效果,但临床研究结果却相互矛盾。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定冲击波速率对冲击波碎石术治疗效果的影响。
检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库,并纳入了所有比较每分钟60次冲击波与每分钟120次冲击波的冲击波碎石术治疗的随机对照试验进行分析。汇总了4项试验(589例患者)的数据。主要结局指标为治疗效果(成功、失败),由原始研究的作者定义。比较每分钟60次与每分钟120次冲击波组治疗成功患者比例的差异作为风险差值,并采用固定效应模型汇总4项试验的风险差值。
以每分钟60次冲击波的速率进行治疗的患者治疗成功的可能性显著更高(风险差值10.2,95%可信区间3.7 - 16.8,p = 0.002)。
我们的荟萃分析表明,与以每分钟120次冲击波的速率进行治疗的患者相比,以每分钟60次冲击波的速率进行治疗的患者治疗成功的可能性显著更高。