Field Emma Louise, Norman Paul, Barton Jane
Clinical Psychology Unit, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK.
Behav Res Ther. 2008 Jan;46(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.10.006. Epub 2007 Oct 13.
This study examined cross-sectional and prospective associations between cognitive appraisals and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following stroke. While in hospital, stroke patients (n=81) completed questionnaires assessing cognitive appraisals (i.e., negative cognitions about the self, negative cognitions about the world, and self-blame) and PTSD symptoms. PTSD symptoms were assessed again 3 months later when all patients had been discharged from hospital (n=70). Significant correlations were found between the time 1 measures of negative cognitions about the self and the world, but not self-blame, and the severity of PTSD symptoms measured at time 1 and at time 2. Regression analyses revealed that cognitive appraisals explained a significant amount of variance in the severity of PTSD symptoms at time 1, with negative cognitions about the self-emerging as a significant predictor. In contrast, time 1 cognitive appraisals were unable to explain additional variance in time 2 PTSD severity over and above that explained by time 1 PTSD severity. The findings therefore provide only weak support for Ehlers and Clark's cognitive model of PTSD.
本研究考察了认知评估与中风后创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状之间的横断面关联和前瞻性关联。在住院期间,中风患者(n = 81)完成了评估认知评估(即对自我的消极认知、对世界的消极认知和自责)和PTSD症状的问卷。3个月后,当所有患者出院时(n = 70),再次评估PTSD症状。研究发现,在时间1时对自我和世界的消极认知(而非自责)的测量结果与在时间1和时间2时测量的PTSD症状严重程度之间存在显著相关性。回归分析显示,认知评估在时间1时解释了PTSD症状严重程度的大量变异,其中对自我的消极认知成为一个显著的预测因素。相比之下,时间1的认知评估无法解释时间2时PTSD严重程度在时间1时PTSD严重程度所解释的变异之外的额外变异。因此,这些发现仅为埃勒斯和克拉克的PTSD认知模型提供了微弱的支持。