Suppr超能文献

在非裔美国人心力衰竭试验中,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或β受体阻滞剂对接受硝酸异山梨酯/肼屈嗪固定剂量联合治疗患者的影响。

Effects of ACE inhibitors or beta-blockers in patients treated with the fixed-dose combination of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine in the African-American Heart Failure Trial.

作者信息

Ghali Jalal K, Tam S William, Ferdinand Keith C, Lindenfeld JoAnn, Sabolinski Michael L, Taylor Anne L, Worcel Manuel, Curry Charles L, Cohn Jay N

机构信息

University Health Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2007;7(5):373-80. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200707050-00007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the A-HeFT (African-American Heart Failure Trial), treatment of African-American patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV heart failure (HF) with fixed-dose combination (FDC) of isosorbide dinitrate/hydralazine (I/H) reduced mortality and morbidity and improved patient reported functional status compared with standard therapy alone.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the benefit of FDC I/H in subgroups based on baseline drug therapy and to investigate whether ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers) [ARBs] or beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) provided additional benefit in FDC I/H-treated African-American patients with HF.

STUDY DESIGN

The A-HeFT was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolling 1050 patients stabilized on optimal HF therapies and with NYHA class III/IV HF with systolic dysfunction conducted during the years 2001-4 with up to 18 months follow-up. The primary endpoint was a composite of mortality, first HF hospitalization, and improvement of quality of life at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included mortality, hospitalizations, and change in quality of life. Prospective Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used for differences between FDC I/H and placebo groups and retrospective analyses were conducted within FDC I/H-treated and placebo groups.

RESULTS

Subgroup analysis for mortality, event-free survival (death or first HF hospitalization), and HF hospitalization showed that FDC I/H, compared with placebo, was effective with or without ACE inhibitors or beta-blockers or other standard medications with all-point estimates favoring the FDC I/H group. Within the placebo-treated group, beta-blockers or ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs were efficacious in improving survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.33; p<0.0001 for [beta]-blocker use and HR 0.39; p=0.01 for ACE inhibitor and/or ARB use). However, within the FDC I/H-treated group, use of beta-blockers, but not ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs, provided additional significant benefit for survival (HR 0.44; p=0.029 and HR 0.60; p=0.34, respectively), event-free survival (HR 0.62; p=0.034 and HR 0.72; p=0.29, respectively) and the composite score of death, HF hospitalization and change in quality of life (p=0.016 and p=0.13, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Based on the analysis of baseline medication use in the A-HeFT, FDC I/H was superior to placebo with or without beta-blockers or ACE inhibitor. However, beta-blockers but not ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs provided additional significant benefit in African-Americans with HF treated with FDC I/H. These analyses are hypotheses generating and their confirmation in clinical trials needs to be considered.

摘要

背景

在非裔美国人心力衰竭试验(A-HeFT)中,与单独的标准治疗相比,使用固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)硝酸异山梨酯/肼屈嗪(I/H)治疗纽约心脏协会(NYHA)III/IV级心力衰竭(HF)的非裔美国人患者,可降低死亡率和发病率,并改善患者报告的功能状态。

目的

基于基线药物治疗情况,研究FDC I/H在亚组中的获益,并探讨血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和/或血管紧张素受体拮抗剂(血管紧张素受体阻滞剂)[ARBs]或β-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂(β-阻滞剂)是否能为接受FDC I/H治疗的非裔美国HF患者带来额外获益。

研究设计

A-HeFT是一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究,在2001年至2004年期间纳入了1050例接受最佳HF治疗且病情稳定、NYHA III/IV级HF伴收缩功能障碍的患者,随访时间长达18个月。主要终点是死亡率、首次HF住院以及6个月时生活质量的改善情况组成的复合终点。次要终点包括死亡率、住院情况以及生活质量的变化。采用前瞻性Kaplan-Meier生存分析比较FDC I/H组和安慰剂组之间的差异,并在FDC I/H治疗组和安慰剂组内进行回顾性分析。

结果

对死亡率、无事件生存(死亡或首次HF住院)和HF住院情况的亚组分析表明,与安慰剂相比,无论是否使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或β-阻滞剂或其他标准药物,FDC I/H均有效,所有点估计值均有利于FDC I/H组。在安慰剂治疗组中,β-阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和/或ARBs在改善生存方面有效(风险比[HR]为0.33;使用β-阻滞剂时p<0.0001,使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和/或ARBs时HR为0.39;p = 0.01)。然而,在FDC I/H治疗组中,使用β-阻滞剂而非血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和/或ARBs在生存(HR分别为0.44;p = 0.029和HR为0.60;p = 0.34)、无事件生存(HR分别为0.62;p = 0.034和HR为0.72;p = 0.29)以及死亡、HF住院和生活质量变化的复合评分方面(p分别为0.016和p = 0.13)提供了额外的显著获益。

结论

基于对A-HeFT中基线用药情况的分析,无论是否使用β-阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂,FDC I/H均优于安慰剂。然而,β-阻滞剂而非血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和/或ARBs为接受FDC I/H治疗的非裔美国HF患者带来了额外的显著获益。这些分析仅为假设,其在临床试验中的证实有待进一步探讨。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验