Swanson Gregory P, Thompson Ian M
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Urol Oncol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6):515-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.05.022.
It is well recognized that radiation can eradicate microscopic neoplastic disease. For that reason it is considered standard treatment in most cancers to give post operative radiation not only for patients with microscopically positive margins, but also for other high risk patients. In spite of the widespread use of adjuvant radiotherapy in other cancers, adjuvant post operative radiation has not been routinely or uniformly used in patients after prostatectomy. The reasons for this have included the following: 1) Not all patients with positive margins will fail; 2) A biomarker prostate specific antigen (PSA) exists that can help predict the patient who is at-risk prior to evidence of clinical recurrence; 3) Some tumors that fail locally are biologically aggressive and will invariably fail systemically; 4) There is no assurance that radiation consistently eradicates local disease; 5) Even if local disease is eradicated, distant progression may not be effected; and 6) Potential toxicity may outweigh benefit of adjuvant therapy. These issues have been debated for over 3 decades, but it appears that data are now available to address these questions.
人们普遍认识到,放疗可以根除微小的肿瘤性疾病。因此,在大多数癌症中,术后放疗不仅被视为切缘镜下阳性患者的标准治疗方法,也适用于其他高危患者。尽管辅助放疗在其他癌症中广泛应用,但前列腺切除术后患者并未常规或统一采用辅助性术后放疗。其原因如下:1)并非所有切缘阳性的患者都会复发;2)存在一种生物标志物——前列腺特异性抗原(PSA),它可以在临床复发迹象出现之前帮助预测高危患者;3)一些局部复发的肿瘤具有生物学侵袭性,最终会出现全身转移;4)无法保证放疗能持续根除局部病灶;5)即使局部病灶被根除,远处转移也可能不受影响;6)辅助治疗的潜在毒性可能超过其益处。这些问题已经争论了30多年,但现在似乎已有数据来解决这些问题。