Du Weiping, Xu Yiming, Wang Yansong
Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Langmuir. 2008 Jan 1;24(1):175-81. doi: 10.1021/la7021165. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
Photoinduced organic oxidation with iron (hydr)oxides in aqueous suspension has been argued with respect to two principal mechanisms: (a) photoinduced ligand-to-metal charge transfer within a surface complex and (b) semiconductor photocatalysis. In this work, the photodegradation of azo dye orange II with UV light (lambda > or = 320 nm) in the aerated aqueous suspensions of haematite, maghemite, magnetite, goethite, lepidocrocite, and feroxyhite at an initial pH of 6.5 has been examined. The results showed that (1) all of the catalysts were effective at initiating dye photodegradation but the iron oxides appeared to be more active than the iron hydroxides; (2) the photodissolution of different iron phases and the dye photolysis in the dissolved iron solutions were very slow; (3) the initial rate of dye loss was proportional to the initial amount of adsorption, implying dye photodegradation on the catalyst surface; and (4) upon addition of H2O2, AgNO3, and NaF to the suspension, the rate of dye photodegradation was significantly enhanced with all the catalysts. In the presence of H2O2, less than 50% of the total rate enhancement was ascribed to the photo-Fenton reaction in solution and the dark Fenton reactions in solution and on the catalyst. In the presence of AgNO3, about 1 mole of silver particles was produced by consuming 3 moles of the dye substrate. In the presence of NaF, hydroxyl radicals were detected by an ethanol scavenger, whereas such radicals were not found in the absence of NaF. Moreover, under visible-light irradiation (lambda > or = 450 nm), the dye degradation was much slower than that under UV irradiation, but the reaction was also accelerated by the addition of NaF and AgNO3. The results suggest that mechanism b, not mechanism a, is operative for dye photodegradation occurring on the iron (hydr)oxides. A detailed discussion of all possible pathways is given in the text.
关于水悬浮液中含铁(氢)氧化物的光诱导有机氧化作用,存在两种主要机制:(a)表面络合物内的光诱导配体到金属的电荷转移,以及(b)半导体光催化。在这项工作中,研究了在初始pH值为6.5的条件下,赤铁矿、磁赤铁矿、磁铁矿、针铁矿、纤铁矿和铁氧氢化物的曝气水悬浮液中,偶氮染料橙II在紫外光(λ≥320 nm)照射下的光降解情况。结果表明:(1)所有催化剂均能有效引发染料光降解,但铁氧化物似乎比氢氧化铁更具活性;(2)不同铁相的光溶解以及溶解铁溶液中的染料光解非常缓慢;(3)染料损失的初始速率与初始吸附量成正比,这意味着染料在催化剂表面发生光降解;(4)向悬浮液中添加H2O2、AgNO3和NaF后,所有催化剂的染料光降解速率均显著提高。在H2O2存在的情况下,总速率提高中不到50%归因于溶液中的光芬顿反应以及溶液中和催化剂上的暗芬顿反应。在AgNO3存在的情况下,消耗3摩尔染料底物会产生约1摩尔银颗粒。在NaF存在的情况下,通过乙醇清除剂检测到了羟基自由基,而在没有NaF的情况下未发现此类自由基。此外,在可见光照射(λ≥450 nm)下,染料降解比紫外光照射下慢得多,但添加NaF和AgNO3也能加速反应。结果表明,机制b而非机制a在含铁(氢)氧化物上发生的染料光降解中起作用。文中对所有可能的途径进行了详细讨论。